首页> 外文会议>SAE World Congress Exhibition >Hot Surface Ignition and Fire Propagation Characteristics of R134a and R1234yf Refrigerants
【24h】

Hot Surface Ignition and Fire Propagation Characteristics of R134a and R1234yf Refrigerants

机译:R134A和R1234YF制冷剂的热表面点火和火力传播特性

获取原文

摘要

This paper summarizes hot surface ignition characteristics of R134a and R1234yf automotive air conditioning fluids on typical under-hood automotive surfaces that possess sufficient heat to ignite flammable or combustible fluids. It further investigates the effect, if any, that these two different fluids may have on the propagation of a fire in two identically equipped vehicles under similar test conditions. This testing, in part, is in response to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's proposal which seeks comments concerning the proposed replacement of the current R134a air conditioning refrigerant with R1234yf. R134a is currently regarded as the global choice for automotive air conditioning systems however the EPA classifies it as an ozone-depleting substance (ODS) and is tasked with proposing and reviewing alternatives that do not contribute to stratospheric ozone depletion. R1234yf refrigerant is classified as a non-ozone-depleting gas by the EPA and has been proposed as an acceptable alternative to R134a through the authority of the Clean Air Act and the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. The SNAP program sets forth criteria for the implementation of R1234yf refrigerant and has indicated that the proposed alternative refrigerant does not have to be risk free to be found acceptable for use. European Union (EU) countries have developed Directive 2006/40/EC that mandates a 100-year CO_2 Global Warming Potential (GWP) of less than 150. R134a is nearly 10 times this level with a rating of 1430 GWP. R1234yf has a GWP rating of 4.0 or approximately 0.3% of the current R134a refrigerant. Hot surface ignition testing of R134a and R1234yf mixtures with PAG 46 oil were evaluated in the first part of this paper. Typical under-hood automotive surfaces at maximum operating temperatures were established, along with a functional AC system to evaluate the ignition characteristics of the refrigerant and lubricant mixtures. Tightly controlled test parameters and conditions were utilized to minimize test-to-test variation. The results obtained in this testing were compared to the published autoignition properties of the refrigerants and other automotive fluids. The second part of this paper assesses the potential effects that the changing from R134a to R1234yf may have on fire propagation in a motor vehicle.
机译:本文总结了R134A和R1234YF汽车空调流体的热表面点火特性,典型的箱罩汽车表面具有足够的热量来点燃易燃或可燃的流体。它进一步研究了这两个不同的流体在两个不同的试验条件下在两种相同的车辆中对火灾的传播的影响。部分测试部分是响应美国环境保护局的提案,该提案旨在提出拟议的R134A空调制冷剂与R1234YF的替代品。 R134A目前被认为是汽车空调系统的全球选择,但EPA将其分类为臭氧耗尽物质(ODS),并且任务是提出和审查没有导致平流层臭氧耗尽的替代方案。 R1234YF制冷剂被EPA归类为非臭氧耗尽气体,并通过清洁空气法的权威和重要的新替代政策(SNAP)计划,作为R134A的可接受替代品。 SNAP计划阐述了R1234YF制冷剂的实施标准,并表明所提出的替代制冷剂不必被自由地冒险使用。欧洲联盟(欧盟)国家开发了指令2006/40 / EC,该指令为2006/40 / EC,授权少于150岁的全球变暖潜力(GWP).R134A是该级别的近10倍,等级为1430 GWP。 R1234YF具有4.0或约0.3%的GWP额定值的R134A制冷剂。在本文的第一部分中评估了R134A和R1234YF混合物R134A和R1234YF混合物的热表面点火测试。建立了最大工作温度的典型箱罩汽车表面,以及功能性AC系统,以评估制冷剂和润滑剂混合物的点火特性。利用紧密控制的测试参数和条件来最小化测试到测试变化。将该测试中获得的结果与制冷剂和其他汽车流体的公开的自燃性能进行了比较。本文的第二部分评估了R134a至R1234YF的变化可能在机动车中的火灾传播的潜在影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号