首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference Exposition >PLEASE, NO POWERPOINT! TEACHING STRATEGIES THAT WORK AND THOSE THAT DO NOT IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION
【24h】

PLEASE, NO POWERPOINT! TEACHING STRATEGIES THAT WORK AND THOSE THAT DO NOT IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION

机译:请,没有PowerPoint!教学策略和那些不在工程教育的教学策略

获取原文

摘要

Much has been said about retention of engineering students in the 21 century. Among the many studies attempting to identify successful teaching techniques and methods for STEM disciplines, few conceptualize success as understanding the subject, getting reasonable good grades but also as remembering key concepts in the future. There are even fewer studies that have asked students directly questions such as what teaching strategies have impacted them the most? Which professors have been successful making the subject clear and understandable to them and why? What did they do? As well as what would they recommend instructors to avoid? We discuss the results of a comprehensive focus group study being undertaken at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez among Industrial Engineering freshmen to the fifth year students. We asked students what they remember about professors that they feel taught them the most, and also of those that did not contribute much to their "engineering education." Among the findings, a prevalence of rejection towards the use of Power Point presentations was revealed. Other findings and conclusions for future research are also discussed surrounding student-centrism vs. teacher-centrism.
机译:已经说了很多关于工程专业的学生在21世纪保留。在众多的研究,试图找出成功的教学技巧和STEM学科,少数概念化成功为理解这一问题,得到合理的好成绩的方法,但也为将来记忆的关键概念。甚至有更少的研究,已要求学生直接的问题,如什么样的教学策略已经影响他们的是什么?其中教授已经成功将目标清晰易懂他们,为什么?他们做了什么?以及他们会怎么推荐导师避免?我们讨论了一个全面的焦点小组研究的结果在波多黎各的马亚圭斯在工业工程新生年至第五年学生的大学正在开展。我们问什么,他们记住的教授,他们觉得教他们最多,学生们也那些没有他们的贡献多的“工程教育”。其中发现,对使用的电源点介绍排斥反应发生率透露。未来研究的其他调查结果和结论进行了讨论围绕学生中心主义与教师中心主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号