首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(771) SATISFACTION ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENTS OF “FUNDAMENTALS OF MATERIALS” IN ACADEMIC YEARS 2010-2011, 2011-2012 AND 2012-2013
【24h】

(771) SATISFACTION ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENTS OF “FUNDAMENTALS OF MATERIALS” IN ACADEMIC YEARS 2010-2011, 2011-2012 AND 2012-2013

机译:(771)2010-2011,2011-2012和2012-2013学术年度“材料基本面”学生的满意评估

获取原文

摘要

The change in the concept of academic credit, currently based on the personal student's work, and thecontinuous and comprehensive evaluation, forced us to modify our teaching and grading, with thedevelopment of new teaching resources.For this reason, the professorship of Building Materials of the Degree in Building Engineering need toknow the satisfaction grade of our pupils in this new situation.It has been raised a assessment based on 12 questions about Building Materials subject which wasanswered by First Year students of the Degree in Building Engineering. This subject, wich is the firstapproach to the Building Materials, is taught in the first semester of the first academic year of thedegree. It is a basic training subject with 6 ECTS credits.The study is completed when undergraduate know their academic mark and it is voluntary. Questionsare focus on “teacher preparation and dedication”, “teacher method to give the class”, “quality ofteaching resources”, “adequacy between level required in the evaluation and the level reach in class”and “student academic results”.The undergraduate can answer in five levels of satisfaction. The evaluation of the assessment is donescoring from 1 to 5 depending on: 1: Unsatisfactory;;2: Poor;;3: Average;;4: Good;;5: Excellent.Investigation results are consolidated into three sectors which are obtained by joining answers 1 and 2in a group called “Bad”, sector of answer 3, “Average”, and the third group, including 4 and 5 answers,called “Good”.With the statistics obtained, we analyze the satisfaction in each question in academic years 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013, making an effort in the results with a lower acceptance by students.Then, the outcome of both years is compared with the intention to determinate the evolution.Depending on the progression, decisions will be taking to improve the future student satisfaction.
机译:在学术信用观念的变化,目前基于个人学生的工作,thecontinuous和综合评价,迫使我们改变我们的教学和分级,用新的教学thedevelopment resources.For这个原因,对建材的教授学位建筑工程需要toknow我们的学生的满意度等级在这个新的situation.It已经提高基于对建材受到其wasanswered由学位建筑工程的一年级学生12个问题一个评估。这个问题上,至极是firstapproach的建材,是教thedegree的第一学年的第一学期。这是一个基本的训练科目有6学分credits.The学习本科时,知道他们的学术标记完成,它是自愿的。 Questionsare注重“教师备课,奉献”,“教师法为类”,“质量ofteaching资源”和“学生成绩” .The本科生可以“并在评估所需水平一流水平之间达到适当性”回答满意的五个级别。评估的评价是从1 donescoring至5取决于:1:不满意;; 2:差; 3:平均; 4:良好;; 5:Excellent.Investigation结果合并成其通过接合获得的三个扇区答案1和2英寸所谓的“坏”组,答案3的部门,“平均”,而第三组,包括4分5的答案,所谓的“好”。随着所获得的统计数据,我们分析在学术每个问题的满意度2010-2011年,2011 - 2012年和2012- 2013年,使得与students.Then较低接受结果的努力,这两年的结果与意向比较确定的对进展的evolution.Depending,决定将服用,以提高未来的学生满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号