首页> 外文会议>HFES Annual Meeting >AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF USABILITY TESTING: HEURISTIC EVALUATION VS. USER TESTING
【24h】

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF USABILITY TESTING: HEURISTIC EVALUATION VS. USER TESTING

机译:可用性测试的实证研究:启发式评估与用户测试

获取原文

摘要

In this study, two different usability-testing methods (Heuristic Evaluation and User Testing) were selected to test the usability of a pre-release version of software searching for Science, Mathematics and Engineering education materials. Our major goal is to compare Heuristic Evaluation and User Testing in terms of efficiency, effectiveness and cost/benefit analysis. We found that Heuristic Evaluation was more efficient than User Testing in finding usability problems (41 vs. 10), while User Testing was more effective than Heuristic Evaluation in finding major problems (70% vs. 12% ). In general, Heuristic Evaluation appears to be more economic in finding a wide range of usability problems by incurring a low cost in comparison to User Testing. However, User Testing can provide more insightful data from real users such as user's performance and satisfaction.
机译:在本研究中,选择了两种不同的可用性测试方法(启发式评估和用户测试)以测试用于科学,数学和工程教育材料的软件预发布版本的可用性。我们的主要目标是在效率,有效性和成本/效益分析方面比较启发式评估和用户测试。我们发现启发式评估比查找可用性问题(41与10)中的用户测试更有效,而用户测试比找到主要问题的启发式评估更有效(70%与12%)更有效。一般而言,启发式评估似乎通过与用户测试相比,通过产生低成本来寻找广泛的可用性问题来更加经济。但是,用户测试可以从诸如用户的性能和满足之类的真实用户提供更多的洞察力数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号