首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Interventions for Reducing Ambient Air Pollution and Their Effects on Health: Final Results from a Cochrane Systematic Review
【24h】

Interventions for Reducing Ambient Air Pollution and Their Effects on Health: Final Results from a Cochrane Systematic Review

机译:减少环境空气污染的干预措施及其对健康的影响:Cochrane系统评价的最终结果

获取原文

摘要

Interest in assessing the health effects of air quality interventions has grown in response to questions about the benefit of further tightening air pollution regulations. No systematic review has been performed to date with transparent and standardized protocols. In brief, standardized protocols were followed for study selection, assessing individual study quality and evaluating the body of evidence. Eligible studies assessed the effectiveness of any intervention aiming to reduce ambient PM air pollution from vehicular, industrial, residential or multiple sources with a range of study designs. Primary outcomes were PM concentrations and all-cause as well as cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. After a three-stage duplicate screening process of 33.462 unique titles, we included 44 interventions evaluated in 53 studies in 20 countries in the main analysis. Changes in PM10 and PM2.5 were assessed for 22 and 11 interventions, respectively, while only 16 studies assessed changes in health outcomes, including 9, 4 and 5 studies assessing total, cardiovascular and respiratory mortality, respectively. Studies included in the main analysis comprised controlled-before after studies and interrupted time series studies with and without a control site. Study quality varied widely. A graphical summary of the evidence showed that effect estimates were heterogeneous, and only some studies documented improvements in air quality and/or health. Given the few studies and the heterogeneity across interventions, outcomes, and study methods, it was difficult to generate any overall conclusions regarding the effectiveness of interventions in improving air quality or health. The review highlights the numerous challenges encountered such as lack of statistical power, background trends, and difficulties in direct attribution. The review provides possible directions and implications for future practice and research, including the use of causal inference methods that has shown promise.
机译:随着人们对进一步加强空气污染法规的益处的质疑,人们对评估空气质量干预措施对健康的影响的兴趣日益浓厚。迄今为止,尚未对透明和标准化的协议进行系统的审查。简而言之,遵循标准化方案进行研究选择,评估个体研究质量和评估证据。合格的研究通过一系列研究设计评估了旨在减少来自汽车,工业,住宅或多种来源的环境PM空气污染的任何干预措施的有效性。主要结局为PM浓度,全因以及心血管和呼吸道疾病。经过33.462个唯一标题的三阶段重复筛选过程,我们在主要分析中纳入了在20个国家/地区的53项研究中评估的44项干预措施。分别针对22和11种干预措施评估了PM10和PM2.5的变化,而只有16项研究评估了健康结局的变化,包括分别评估总死亡率,心血管疾病和呼吸道死亡率的9项,4项和5项研究。主要分析中包括的研究包括前后对照研究,以及有无对照部位的中断时间序列研究。学习质量差异很大。图形化的证据总结表明,效果评估是不统一的,只有一些研究记录了空气质量和/或健康的改善。鉴于研究很少,并且干预措施,结果和研究方法之间存在异质性,因此很难就干预措施在改善空气质量或健康方面的有效性得出任何总体结论。审查强调了遇到的众多挑战,例如缺乏统计能力,背景趋势以及直接归因困难。这篇综述为未来的实践和研究提供了可能的方向和启示,包括使用因果关系推理方法已显示出希望。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号