首页> 外文会议>International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering >Correction Methods for Aircraft Noise Control Zone and Noise Contours Planning at Heliports of the Republic of China (Taiwan)
【24h】

Correction Methods for Aircraft Noise Control Zone and Noise Contours Planning at Heliports of the Republic of China (Taiwan)

机译:中华民国直升机场飞机噪声控制区和噪声轮廓规划的校正方法(台湾)

获取原文

摘要

The results of noise contours planning and monitoring data at heliports of the Republic of China (Taiwan) are often doubted by the public because of the gap between the measured noise level and the real noise perceived by the public. Is it because that the helicopter flight paths adopted in the current model are different from the real ones? Or there are situations in which more than one helicopters taking off simultaneously or team flying being needed during flight training? Or the records of flight paths made by the control tower are not complete? All these factors may lead to the inaccuracy of follow-up dynamic flight data input by the Aircraft Noise Monitoring Center and influence the results of noise contours planning. In addition, the helicopter has particular flight characteristics, such as hovering flight, longer standby time, slower flying speed, and lower flying altitude. However, the current model cannot achieve the level of real simulation of each flight situation due to such factors as meteorological conditions, flight speed, altitude and thrust when the helicopter is taking off or landing or hovering in the air. These factors tend to make a difference to the real take-off and landing flight paths, as well as standard operating procedures. A minor difference in the air may cause a huge variation as much as several kilometers on the ground. Besides, the low-frequency noise character of the helicopter may cause a difference to noise distribution. Therefore, we hope to establish correction methods for aircraft noise control zone and noise contours planning at heliports of the Republic of China (Taiwan) through on-the-spot measurement of aircraft noise. In terms of objective measurement, the mean deviation of noise level between A-weighting and C-weighting is 10 dB(A). However, whether or not this value represents a good correction to fit with surrounding residents' actual perception on helicopter noise will need to be supplemented with social investigation. The 50-50 method is usually used to confirm the correction. The definition of noise correction is "the variation between the helicopter noise and reference noise when they cause the same level of annoyance". Since the break-even point of the helicopter noise is 62dB, to reach equivalence of noise annoyance, the reference noise level needs to be corrected with +8dB(A) (subjective investigation: Investigation of people's actual perception of annoyance; 8dB(A) correction). Therefore, the correction is recommended to be 8dB(A) in order to fit with the public opinions and quench public complaints by meeting with the public's psychological perception.
机译:由于测量的噪声水平与公众所感知的真实噪音之间,公众常常怀疑中华民国(台湾)噪声轮廓规划和监测数据的结果。是,因为当前模型中采用的直升机飞行路径与真实的飞行路径不同?或者有些情况下,多个直升机同时脱落或在飞行训练期间需要队伍?或者控制塔制造的飞行路径记录不完整?所有这些因素可能导致飞机噪声监测中心输入的后续动态飞行数据的不准确性,并影响噪声轮廓规划的结果。此外,直升机具有特殊的飞行特征,如徘徊飞行,待机时间更长,飞行速度较慢,较低的飞行高度。然而,由于气象条件,飞行速度,海拔高度和推力在直升机正在起飞或在空气中徘徊时,目前的模型无法达到每个飞行情况的实际模拟水平。这些因素倾向于对真正的起飞和着陆飞行路径以及标准操作程序有所不同。空气的轻微差异可能导致地面上几公里的巨大变化。此外,直升机的低频噪声特性可能导致与噪声分布的差异。因此,我们希望通过飞机噪音的现场测量来建立中华民国(台湾)的飞机噪声控制区和噪声轮廓规划的校正方法。在客观测量方面,加权和C重量之间的噪声水平的平均偏差为10dB(a)。然而,这种价值是否代表良好的纠正,以适应周围居民的实际看法,需要补充社会调查。 50-50方法通常用于确认校正。噪声校正的定义是“当它们导致相同烦恼水平时的直升机噪声和参考噪声之间的变化”。由于直升机噪声的断裂点为62dB,以达到噪声烦恼的等价性,因此需要用+ 8dB(a)纠正参考噪声水平(主观调查:对人们对烦恼的实际感知的调查; 8dB(a)更正)。因此,建议更正为8dB(a),以便通过与公众的心理感知会面来符合公众意见和淬火公众投诉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号