您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 农地城市流转

农地城市流转

农地城市流转的相关文献在1999年到2022年内共计102篇,主要集中在农业经济、经济计划与管理、经济学 等领域,其中期刊论文90篇、会议论文12篇、专利文献58731篇;相关期刊46种,包括江汉论坛、广东土地科学、中国土地科学等; 相关会议7种,包括第五届全国土地资源管理博士生论坛、纪念中国地学会在津成立100周年纪念大会暨学术报告会、2009年中国土地学会学术年会等;农地城市流转的相关文献由104位作者贡献,包括张安录、宋敏、闵捷等。

农地城市流转—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:90 占比:0.15%

会议论文>

论文:12 占比:0.02%

专利文献>

论文:58731 占比:99.83%

总计:58833篇

农地城市流转—发文趋势图

农地城市流转

-研究学者

  • 张安录
  • 宋敏
  • 闵捷
  • 乔荣锋
  • 彭开丽
  • 高进云
  • 高魏
  • 崔新蕾
  • 李晓云
  • 蔡银莺
  • 期刊论文
  • 会议论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

年份

    • 黄珂; 任兰心; 李会琴; 刘晶晶; 张婷
    • 摘要: 本文以武汉城市圈为研究区域,将非期望产出纳入分析框架,建立SBM-Undesirable模型,测算农地城市流转效率,分析效率影响因素,探寻农地城市流转效率优化策略。研究表明:(1)将非期望产出即环境污染纳入农地城市流转效率的测算体系可有效解决传统效率高估问题;(2)时序上,2010—2019年武汉城市圈农地城市流转总体效率在0.77~0.85区间波动,处于效率较高水平;(3)空间上,城市圈内城市间效率水平差距较大,主要原因在于不同城市在社会经济生产过程中对于污染处理技术的推广利用程度及农地城市流转配置规模的差异;(4)武汉城市圈9市普遍存在资源环境投入要素过剩而经济产出不足、污染排放超量的情况。为促进经济社会有序转型,提高农地城市流转效率,政府应持续鼓励自主创新能力建设,运用高新科技来合理高效利用城市土地,提升农地城市流转技术效率;采取差别化管理政策,加强土地市场化建设,减缓农地城市流转过度的状况,提升农地城市流转规模效率。
    • 邓苏玲
    • 摘要: 截取中国2004~2015年30个省级行政区域的面板数据,采用全排列多边形图示指标法对城市土地生态可持续利用水平进行测算,并通过协整分析、脉冲响应、方差分解等动态分析方法,对农地城市流转与土地生态可持续利用之间的长期动态关系进行了检验.研究结果显示:①农地城市流转与土地生态可持续利用之间具有长期稳定的关系,农地城市流转有利于土地生态可持续利用提高,说明城市建设用地扩张有利于带动地区生态环境的改善;②农地城市流转对土地生态可持续利用在短期内有反向作用,长期内农地城市流转和土地生态可持续利用趋于稳定.说明城市地区土地的经营模式需要向土地生态可持续利用模式转变,国家及政府部门需要加大城市地区生态建设的支持和投入力度.
    • 王文成
    • 摘要: 本文以我国东、中、西部地区的典型省份为研究区域,应用了选择实验法(CE),通过测算主要利益主体——农户和市民对生态福祉损害进行恢复的支付意愿,评估了在农地城市流转过程中因生态系统服务功能弱化引起的生态福祉损失,并探讨了不同利益主体对农地城市流转生态补偿政策偏好.在此基础上,构建了针对农地城市流转的生态补偿机制总体框架和跨区域的生态补偿机制.
    • 宋敏; 王登娜
    • 摘要: 作为城镇化过程中土地资源配置的必然过程,大规模的农地城市流转会给耕地保护和土地资源的可持续利用带来巨大压力.研究农地城市流转规模及其影响因素作用程度的空间异质性对于揭示农地城市流转的复杂性,进而采取差别化的、有针对性的管制措施控制农地城市流转规模具有熏要意义.鉴于此,本文在阐释中国大陆31个省(自治区、直辖市)农地城市流转规模在经度、纬度方向上的变化规律的基础上,运用全域及局域自相关模型分析了省域尺度上中国农地城市流转规模的空间异质性,继而进一步采用地理加权回归模型揭示了省域农地城市流转规模各影响因素作用程度的空间异质性,结果表明:①31个省(自治区、直辖市)的农地城市流转规模在水平方向上自西向东呈稳定上升趋势,纬度方向上在中国中部省份达到最高值并分别向南北两个方向省份逐渐下降,呈现倒“U”型.②全国范围内省域农地城市流转规模呈现出一定程度的空间关联特征,省域农地城市流转规模的局部自相关随区域而变化,体现出空间异质性.③全社会固定资产投资额、居民人均可支配收入、年初耕地面积、第三产业比重四个因素影响雀域农地城市流转规模,且影响程度随空间位置不同而变化,除全社会固定资产投资对省域农地城市流转规模的影响程度在全国范围内空间分布较均匀外,其他三个因素的影响程度呈现较大的空间异质性.因此,应在充分考虑空间异质性的基础上,通过提高规划方案或管制措施的差异性和针对性实现对农地城市流转规模的有效管制.%As the inevitable process of land resources allocation in urbanization,large scale of rural-urban land conversion will bring enormous pressure on the protection of cultivated land and the sustainable use of land resources.Studying the spatial heterogeneity of rural-urban land conversion scale and effects of its influential factors is substantial for revealing the complexities of rural-urban land conversion and is helpful for regulating its scale via adopting differentiated and targeted control measures.This paper firstly explores the law of rural-urban land conversion scale of 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in longitude and dimension direction.Based on that,it then analyzes the spatial heterogeneity of rural-urban land conversion scale on provincial scale by employing the global autocorrelation model and local autocorrelation model.Moreover,the spatial heterogeneity of effects of influential factors on rural-urban land conversion scale is studied.The results show that rural-urban land conversion scales of 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) display a steady upward trend in the horizontal direction and an inverted ‘ U’ type in latitude direction which means the scales reach the maximum value in provinces located in Central China and then decline gradually in provinces located in North and South China respectively.The provincial scales of agricultural land circulation in China are spatially related and the local auto correlation of provincial scales changes according to the regions they belong to which reflect the spatial heterogeneity.Four influential factors including total investment in fixed assets,residents' per capita disposable income,and quantity of farmland at the beginning of the year as well as the tertiary industry proportion have influences on rural-urban land conversion scale and the degree of influence varies with the spatial position.Besides the factor of total investment in fixed assets,all the other factors have great spatial heterogeneity of the degree of influence.Therefore,on the basis of considering spatial heterogeneity adequately,the differentiation and pertinence of land use planning as well as measures of regulation should be greatly improved in order to achieve the effective control of the rural-urban land conversion scale.
    • 黄珂; 张安录; 李会琴
    • 摘要: 经济社会双重转型背景下,城市群已成为带动区域经济增长的主要地域单元,其形成与发展以城市扩张为基础,需不断占用农地资源.当前主要问题为农地城市流转过度,粮食安全受到威胁、生态环境遭到不可逆转的破坏.基于此,本文以中国16大城市群为研究对象,考虑环境污染,应用基于方向性距离函数的Malmquist-Luenberger指数,利用1999年至2013共15年的面板数据,借助数据包络分析法(DEA),对农地城市流转全要素生产率(TFP)进行测算和分析.结果显示:①研究农地城市流转TFP时考虑非期望产出即环境污染是合理且必要的.②1999年至2013年,农地城市流转参与社会经济生产的过程中,减少污染与环境副作用的技术发展与推广还存在障碍,提高生产要素投入质量的能力有限.③对16大城市群而言,农地城市流转TFP在研究期内均下降,西部城市群下降幅度最大,中部和东部次之,东北较小.④珠三角、长三角和武汉城市群在农地城市流转参与社会经济生产过程中对先进技术的运用较为合理和充分,作为“环境技术领先者”次数较多.针对研究结论,为我国城市群有效进行农地城市流转提出几点建议:第一,合理控制农地城市流转规模与城市增长边界,优化农地城市流转TFP,并提升城市群经济发展质量.第二,充分考虑农地城市流转TFP及其构成要素的区域差异,根据各城市群发展特征、资源禀赋状况以及区域功能定位差异等特点,实施土地利用差别化管理.第三,更多地使用可再生的资源和环保能源,并对土地资源加以合理配置和离效利用,走绿色环保城市群发展道路.%Under the background of socioeconomic transformation,metropolitan areas have become major geographic units that support regional economic growth.The formation and development of metropolitan areas are based on the urban sprawl and always encroach on farmland.Problems then arise:excessive land conversion from rural to urban areas which impedes on food security and lead to irreversible destruction of ecological environment.This paper took 16 metropolitan areas in China as study areas,considered environmental pollution as an undesirable output,and used Malmquist-Luenberger index based on Directional Distance Functions to measure the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) of Rural-urban Land Conversion (RULC) which relied on the method of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the data from 1999 to 2013.The results were:①When we studied the TFP of RULC,it was reasonable and necessary to consider the undesirable output (environment pollution).②From 1999 to 2013,there were barriers in the development and promotion of the technique which could be used to reduce environment pollution and its side effect in the process of socioeconomic production with RULC participating,therefore,the production factors could not be used efficiently.③The average TFP of RULC of the 16 metropolitan areas in China decreased smoothly from the western,the northeastern and central to the eastern metropolitan areas during the study period.④ The number of times that Pearl River Delta,Yangtze River Delta and Wuhan metropolitan areas became innovators were the most,because these metropolitan areas could use the advanced technique rationally in socioeconomic production with RULC participating.According to the research results and in order to improve efficiency of RULC in the metropolitan areas in China,we put forward some suggestions:firstly,the amount of the rural-urban conversion land and boundary of urban growth must be reasonable controlled,TFP of RULC should be optimized,and the quality of economic development in metropolitan areas must be promoted;secondly,regional differences of TFP of RULC and its components must be taken into full consideration and differential management strategy of land use can be implemented to different metropolitan areas according to their development features,resource endowment and regional function orientations;lastly,renewable resource and green energy must be more used and land resource must be allocated reasonably and used efficiendy,and we must follow the green development path.
    • 蔡茜; 刘鹏凌
    • 摘要: 运用数据包络分析(DEA)和Malmquist生产指数对2011—2016年安徽省16个地市的农地城市流转效率进行动态评价,并从投入产出冗余角度对其优化.研究表明:(1)安徽省在2011—2016年间的农地城市流转综合效率均值为0.922,只有合肥、 池州2个地市在6年中均达到了DEA有效,地域差异明显,在农地城市流转效率上,皖南>皖中>皖北.(2)从时间序列来看,6年间16个地市的农地城市流转综合效率整体变动幅度不大,前两年呈增长趋势,后三年呈下降趋势,技术效率的提高对Malmquist生产率变化指数的提升贡献最大.(3)从投入产出冗余结果来看,安徽省6年来各地市固定资产投资过多和城镇居民人均可支配收入不足是导致DEA无效的主要原因.最后,从投入数量、 投入结构和产权主体等方面对农地城市流转效率的提升提出相应的对策建议.
    • 王晨歌; 戚新秋
    • 摘要: 农地城市流转是我国经济发展和农村城市化进程中存在的社会经济现象,从长远看,其产生的社会效益和经济效益是积极有益的,但也存在着明显问题,如土地资源配置不合理,威胁粮食安全,恶化生态环境等.既要注重农地城市流转对城市发展建设起到的作用,又不能忽视其对农村基础设施建设的影响.本文总结了农地城市流转制度演变进程,对农地城市流转进行了分析评价并提出了相应的对策研究.
    • 魏玲; 张安录
    • 摘要: 农地城市流转与农地征收市场、土地一级市场、城市土地二级市场密切相关,而农民和村集体、地方政府和中央政府、开发商等三类主体所分享的福利增量分别位于这三层次市场。根据农地城市流转福利增量形成机制,建立福利分配测算模型,以广东21市数据为基础进行实证测算,得出如下结论:三类主体福利分享比例与各自在流转中的地位、谈判能力和信息优劣势有关;开发商的福利份额最大,地方政府次之,农民和村集体最少;经济发达地区三类主体福利分配差距较大;全部城市的福利分配比例在时间上呈动态变化。%The process of rural-urban land conversion is closely related to the expropriation market of agricultural land, the primary land market, and the secondary land market. Welfare increment shared by the three kinds of stakeholders including farmers and villages, local governments and central government,and developers,exists in the three-level land market.Accordingly, the economic welfare increment in land conversion was analyzed,and the welfare distribution calculation model was established.Based on the data of 2 1 cities in Guangdong Province, it was concluded that the proportion of the three stakeholders’ welfare distribution lies in the position during the process, negotiating ability, and information advantages and disadvantages;developers obtain the most share of welfare,local governments second,and farmers and villages share the least;welfare distribution gaps in the three levels are larger in the developed areas;and the welfare distribution proportion in the 2 1 cities is dynamic in time.
    • 宋敏; 雷耀
    • 摘要: 发展与保护的权衡是土地资源配置中难以回避的棘手问题.农地城市流转在为城镇化的快速推进提供土地要素的同时,却也在社会、生态方面引起一系列外部性损失,已有研究认为该损失的大小与农地城市流转的用途和周围环境有关,但并未进一步定量揭示其关联程度.鉴于此,本文将农地城市流转的去向归纳为住宅及商服用地、工矿仓储及交通运输用地、公共管理与公共服务用地三类,以武汉市和鄂州市作为研究区域,运用选择实验法(CE)以及多元Logit模型(MNL)识别了受访者对于农地城市流转负外部效应治理方案的偏好,从而间接测度了不同流向下农地城市流转负外部效应的经济总量,以期为实施农地城市流转的用途和规模管制提供依据.结果表明:①不同流向下农地城市流转产生的交通状况恶化、噪音污染、公共设施不足等七种类别负外部效应在类型和强度上有所差异;②绝大多数居民对治理农地城市流转的负外部性具有支付意愿,且在参与程度和参与强度(支付额)方面因农地城市流转的不同流向两有所区别,并且居民的受教育程度和家庭收入水平对选择效用的影响具有显著性且呈正相关关系;③不同流向下农地城市流转所产生的负外部效应的经济总量不容忽视,三种流向的负外部效应从大到小依次为农地流转为工矿仓储及交通运输用地、公共管理与公共服务用地、住宅及商服用地.因此,作为农地城市流转的管制主体,各级政府应当采用经济性管制与社会性管制并举的多样化管制手段对农地城市流转的用途和规模予以调控和管制.%The tradeoff between development and protection is an inevitable problem.Rural-urban land conversion provides land element to the rapid urbanization in China,but it also triggers a series of external costs in both social and ecological aspects.Current studies suggest that the amount of these costs is related to different land use change directions of rural-urban land conversion.But they haven't revealed the degree of correlation.In view of this,this paper classifies the urban land uses which converted from rural land to three kinds,including residential and commercial land,industrial and transportation land,public management and service land.The Choice Experiment (CE) method and Multinominal Logit Models are employed to the case study of Wuhan City and Ezhou City in China.The interviewees' preferences of the improvement program of the negative externalities stem from rural-urban land conversion are revealed,and the negative externalities originate from different land use change directions are measured accordingly,which can be the foundations for regulating the usage and scale of rural-urban land conversion.The results can be summarized as follows.First,seven kinds of external externalities,such as noise,inadequate public facilities and so on which stem from different land use change directions of rural-urban land conversion are different in categories and intensive.Second,the majority of residents have willingness to pay for the management of negative externalities and their degree and intensity (payment amount) of participation are different according to different land use change directions.At the meantime,the influence of the residents' education experience and households' income on their choice of utility is significant and they are positively correlated.Moreover,the evaluation values of the negative externalities stem from rural-urban land conversion are enormous.The values are ranked from industrial and transportation land,public management to service land and residential and commercial land in descending order.Therefore,governments at all levels who are the regulation subjects of rural-urban land conversion should apply both economic and social regulation measures to control the use and scale of rural-urban land conversion.
    • 宋敏; 刘一鸣; 张雄
    • 摘要: Assessing the efficiency of rural-urban land conversion and analyzing its influential factors have sufficient significance for the optimal allocation of land resources and protection of limited agricultural land .The study investigates the temporal and spatial changing trends of rural-urban land conversion efficiency in Henan Province and its 18 cities using the method of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA ) ,analyzes its influential factors by the method of Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA ) and optimizes the efficiency of rural - urban land conversion from the perspective of input element employing the DEA projection model ultimately .T he results show that the comprehensive efficiency in Henan Province increased first and then decreased in 2005 -2014 .T here are obvious differences among different areas in this province w hile most of the cities ' comprehensive efficiency remains on the state of average or low .Invalid scale efficiency is the main cause of low comprehensive efficiency . T hree factors ,such as GDP per capita ,comparable profit of land use and ,regional industrial structure upgrading exerted positive influences on rural-urban land conversion efficiency , w hile population urbanization rate played a negative role .In the study period ,Henna province and most of its cities have faced problem of farmland over-input .It has been revealed that there is 34 .18% ~66 .31% of farmland should be conserved .Finally ,this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the efficiency of rural-urban land conversion in Henan province .%运用数据包络分析法(DEA)分析了河南省及其下辖18个主要城市的农地城市流转效率时空变化趋势,继而采用随机前沿分析法(SFA)探究其影响因素,最后基于DEA投影方法从投入要素的角度进行了农地城市流转效率优化.结果表明:2005—2014年间,河南省农地城市流转综合效率总体呈先上升后下降趋势且多数年份效率低下,区域间差异明显,多数城市的综合效率为一般或低下状态;而规模效率无效是导致综合效率低下的主要原因.人均GDP、土地利用比较效益和区域产业结构升级三个因素对农地城市流转效率有正向影响,而人口城镇化率对农地城市流转效率有负向影响.河南省总体及其下辖多数城市在研究期内存在耕地投入冗余问题,具有34.18%~66.31%不等的优化空间.最后,研究提出了提升河南省农地城市流转效率的对策建议.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号