首页> 外文OA文献 >Beyond progressive liberalism and cultural relativism: Towards critical postmodernist, sociohistorically situated perspectives in classroom studies
【2h】

Beyond progressive liberalism and cultural relativism: Towards critical postmodernist, sociohistorically situated perspectives in classroom studies

机译:超越进步的自由主义和文化相对主义:走向批判的后现代主义,社会历史观点的课堂研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper we propose that classroom studies in the TESOL field tend to subscribe to either of the following two normative orders: (a) progressive liberalism, and (b) cultural relativism, without reflexively recognizing and meta-analysing these normative frameworks and their social, historical, and political situatedness. Drawing on Foucault's (1981) methods of historical excavation, we attempt a critical analysis of the socio-historical situatedness of these modernist normative orders. By building on relational analysis from critical educational studies (Apple, 1999), critical ethnography (Canagarajah, 1993; Chick, 1996; Kumaravadivelu, 1999; Pennycook, 2001), and the theory and method of articulation from cultural studies (Slack, 1996), we propose critical postmodernist, socio-historically situated perspectives in classroom studies and educational research as alternatives that break away from the modernist determinism of reproduction theories on the one hand, and radical postmodernist relativism on the other. We illustrate how such perspectives can contribute to our understanding of classroom practices with two classroom examples from Hong Kong schools, and we attempt to show the potential of these perspectives for contributing to the opening up of possibilities for change.
机译:在本文中,我们建议TESOL领域的课堂研究倾向于遵循以下两个规范性命令之一:(a)进步自由主义和(b)文化相对主义,而无需反身地认识和荟萃分析这些规范性框架及其社会意义。 ,历史和政治环境。借鉴福柯(1981)的历史发掘方法,我们尝试对这些现代主义规范秩序的社会历史位置进行批判性分析。通过对批判教育研究(Apple,1999),批判人种志(Canagarajah,1993; Chick,1996; Kumaravadivelu,1999; Pennycook,2001)的关系分析以及文化研究的表述理论和方法(Slack,1996) ,我们提出了在课堂研究和教育研究中具有批判性的后现代主义,社会历史定位的观点,作为一种选择,它们一方面脱离了再生产理论的现代主义决定论,另一方面又脱离了激进的后现代主义相对论。我们通过两个香港学校的课堂实例说明了这些观点如何有助于我们对课堂实践的理解,并且试图展示这些观点在促进变革可能性方面的潜力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lin A; Luk J;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2002
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号