首页> 外文OA文献 >Impact of emotions on consumers’ reactions to corporate negative publicity: an examination of brand equity
【2h】

Impact of emotions on consumers’ reactions to corporate negative publicity: an examination of brand equity

机译:情绪对消费者对企业负面宣传的反应的影响:品牌资产调查

摘要

Previous literature does not provide adequate insights into the role that emotions play in consumers’ reactions to corporate scandals. Several research questions remain unanswered. (1) What is the relationship between attributions and emotions? (2) How does negative publicity influence brand equity? (3) What is the difference between product–related (PDR) and non–product–related (NPDR) negative publicity? (4) Do post-scandal emotions have carry–over effects on future preference formation? To answer these questions, this thesis probes the consumer emotional reaction process after consumers have been exposed to a corporate scandal. The thesis attempts to provide answers to the aforementioned research questions through the development of a conceptual model and rigorous empirical testing using experimental studies, structural equation and dynamic panel modelling. Paper One of this thesis reports on two experiments designed to test an emotion–driven model, which partly answers research question (1). The results of Paper One suggest that emotions can influence the attributional process by creating bias in information integration. In Paper Two, a comparison between two types of negative publicity, PDR and NPDR scandals, is presented. The findings suggest that the impact of emotions on brand association is reasonably consistent across the two types of scandals, while the impact of attributions is weaker for NPDR scandals. PDR scandals, as predicted, have more impact on product quality perception than do NPDR scandals. Meanwhile, brand association and quality perception fully mediate the influence of negative publicity on brand loyalty. Therefore, Paper Two answers research questions (2) and (3). Paper Three looks at the carry–over effects of emotions on brand association and consumer utility. Research questions (2) and (4) are answered by this paper. The findings support most of the postulated effects. Thus it can be concluded that emotions have more predictive power in consumers’ future preference formation and decision making than previously considered. The thesis contributes to the current literature by combining important and disparate concepts of emotional branding, corporate social responsibility, and moral emotions, to provide a comprehensive framework to investigate the impact of scandals and negative publicity.
机译:以前的文献没有充分了解情绪在消费者对公司丑闻的反应中所起的作用。几个研究问题仍然没有答案。 (1)归因与情感之间是什么关系? (2)负面宣传如何影响品牌资产? (3)产品相关(PDR)与非产品相关(NPDR)负面宣传有何区别? (4)丑闻后的情绪对未来的偏好形成有影响吗?为了回答这些问题,本文探讨了在消费者暴露于公司丑闻之后的消费者情感反应过程。本文试图通过开发概念模型并使用实验研究,结构方程和动态面板建模进行严格的经验检验,为上述研究问题提供答案。本文的一篇论文报告了两个旨在测试情绪驱动模型的实验,这些实验部分回答了研究问题(1)。论文一的结果表明,情绪可以通过在信息整合中产生偏见来影响归因过程。在第二篇论文中,对两种负面宣传(PDR和NPDR丑闻)进行了比较。研究结果表明,在两种类型的丑闻中,情绪对品牌联想的影响是合理一致的,而对于NPDR丑闻,归因的影响则较弱。正如预期的那样,PDR丑闻比NPDR丑闻对产品质量感知的影响更大。同时,品牌联想和质量感知充分调解了负面宣传对品牌忠诚度的影响。因此,论文二回答了研究问题(2)和(3)。第三篇论文探讨了情绪对品牌联想和消费者效用的影响。本文回答了研究问题(2)和(4)。该发现支持大多数假定的影响。因此可以得出结论,情绪对消费者未来的偏好形成和决策的预测能力比以前考虑的要强。本文通过结合重要的和截然不同的情感品牌,企业社会责任和道德情感概念,为当前文献做出了贡献,为调查丑闻和负面宣传的影响提供了一个全面的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号