首页> 外文OA文献 >Critical literacy in the teaching of composition: An analysis of the multi-layered, poly-voiced role of texts in the classroom.
【2h】

Critical literacy in the teaching of composition: An analysis of the multi-layered, poly-voiced role of texts in the classroom.

机译:作文教学中的批判性读写能力:对文本在教室中的多层,多声部作用的分析。

摘要

The purpose of this research project is to investigate the manner in which texts are used in the classroom to either promote or inhibit critical literacy. Over a period of five months, from the Fall Semester of 1994, through the Spring Semester of 1995, I completed an ethnographic research study at four levels of education--the high school, the community college, the four-year college, and the university, all of which are located within Yavapai County in Northern Arizona. The results of that study are contained within this report. Chapter One of this report presents the main argument of this project--that is, that critical literacy too often is not a vital consideration in textual selection and application in the average English composition classroom. Chapter Two is a review of the theoretical definition of critical literacy as it has evolved over the past quarter century. Of most importance in this analysis, however, is the relationship of critical literacy to classroom texts, especially in terms of the implications of liberatory pedagogy. In Chapter Three of my report I establish the method by which I will use ethnography--specifically critical ethnography--to test my hypothesis in actual classroom observations. In this chapter I also explain my particular design, which involves direct classroom observation, as well as teacher and student questionnaires and interviews. These data-gathering methods provide the triangulation that is vital to my interpretation of the overall project. Chapters Four and Five of this report focus on the actual case studies. Chapter Four is a presentation of the overall conditions of observation at the various schools. The second part of the chapter is devoted to the presentation and interpretation of the descriptive notes that I took during my observation. Finally, in Chapter Five, I conclude my presentation with a discussion of the significant implications of my findings, as well as suggestions about the ways in which my study might be further extended.
机译:该研究项目的目的是研究在教室中使用文字来促进或抑制批判性读写能力的方式。从1994年秋季学期到1995年春季学期,在五个月的时间里,我完成了民族志研究的研究,涉及四个教育层次:高中,社区学院,四年制大学和大学,所有这些都位于亚利桑那州北部的亚瓦派县。该研究的结果包含在本报告中。本报告的第一章介绍了该项目的主要论点-也就是说,在普通英语作文教室中,对于通常的语篇选择和应用来说,批判性读写能力并不是一个至关重要的考虑因素。第二章回顾了过去25年以来批判性扫盲的理论定义。然而,在这种分析中,最重要的是批判素养与课堂教科书的关系,特别是在解放教育学的意义上。在报告的第三章中,我建立了使用民族志方法(特别是批判性民族志方法)在实际课堂观察中检验我的假设的方法。在本章中,我还将解释我的特殊设计,其中涉及直接的课堂观察以及师生问卷和访谈。这些数据收集方法提供了三角剖分,这对于我对整个项目的解释至关重要。本报告的第四章和第五章着重于实际案例研究。第四章介绍了各学校的整体观察情况。本章的第二部分专门介绍和解释我在观察过程中采取的描述性注释。最后,在第五章中,我以关于研究结果的重大意义的讨论作为结尾,并就进一步研究的方式提出了建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Paddison John Howard.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1995
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号