首页> 外文OA文献 >A Mana Wahine Critical Analysis of New Zealand Legislation Concerning Education: Implications for Addressing Māori Social Disadvantage
【2h】

A Mana Wahine Critical Analysis of New Zealand Legislation Concerning Education: Implications for Addressing Māori Social Disadvantage

机译:对新西兰有关教育的立法进行的法力·沃因批判性分析:对解决毛利人社会弱势群体的启示

摘要

Theory and practice are intertwined, woven inextricably together by the way that each informs and is informed by the other (Moss 2002, Pihama 2001, Simmonds 2009). This research confronts and analyses the legal bases of gendered and race-based inequalities by critically analysing New Zealand social policy legislation through a mana wahine perspective. Mana wahine and critical policy analysis share common goals to challenge dominant theoretical and methodological norms in order to recognise unequal power distributions, of which colonisation is implicit (Tomlins-Jahnke 1997).This research has been guided by a reading of literature that suggests Māori social disadvantage has become ingrained and that policies designed to address this inequality and to include Māori people and Māori perspectives in mainstreamed systems are both confusing, and yet to be successful. This study has been designed to explore present policy legislation concerning social development. A case study of the education system has been used, which draws on historic and more contemporary Western political agendas as reflected in legislative shifts.Key findings of this research include the exclusion of mana wahine through the ongoing processes of colonisation that do not give rise to Māori cultural understandings. To summarise, the social policy context at present is characterised by: Māori demands for greater self-determination; an absence of Treaty rights for Māori; liberal interpretations of Treaty principles, and scant processes to implement them; a devoid of aspects pertinent to mana wahine, and; the contradiction between Government's articulated position on rights and inclusion in social policy and the language used in and concepts enforced by legislation.The findings are significant and reveal the ongoing complexities of Indigenous inequalities in the context of widespread policy ‘commitment’ to inclusion and equality. The central argument developed throughout this study is that there is an urgent need to shift policy thinking toward Māori if there is to be a significant movement toward justice for Māori women, which will involve Māori-centred decolonisation and the inclusion of aspects pertinent to mana wahine.
机译:理论和实践是交织在一起的,彼此之间相互交织,相互交流(Moss 2002,Pihama 2001,Simmonds 2009)。这项研究通过以法力华因的角度批判性地分析了新西兰的社会政策立法,从而面对和分析了性别不平等和基于种族的不平等的法律基础。玛娜·华因(Mana wahine)和批评性政策分析具有共同的目标,可以挑战主导的理论和方法论规范,以承认不平等的权力分布,而其中的殖民化是隐性的(Tomlins-Jahnke 1997)。不利因素已根深蒂固,旨在解决这种不平等现象并在主流制度中纳入毛利人和毛利人观点的政策既令人困惑,也未取得成功。本研究旨在探讨有关社会发展的现行政策法规。我们使用了一个教育系统的案例研究,该案例借鉴了立法转变中反映出的历史性和更现代的西方政治议程,该研究的主要发现包括通过正在进行的殖民化进程排除了法力华因,这并未导致毛利人的文化理解。总而言之,当前的社会政策环境的特点是:毛利人要求更大的自决权;缺少毛利人的条约权利;对条约原则的自由解释,以及缺乏执行这些原则的程序;缺乏与法力华因有关的方面;以及调查结果具有重要意义,揭示了在普遍对包容和平等的政策“承诺”的背景下,土著不平等现象的复杂性。贯穿本研究的中心论点是,如果要为毛利妇女争取正义而采取重大行动,则迫切需要将政策思想转向毛利人,这将涉及以毛利人为中心的非殖民化并纳入与法力华因有关的方面。

著录项

  • 作者

    Paul Tagan Wetekia;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号