首页> 外文OA文献 >Les contours de líntervention en ergonomie prospective: Analyse comparative de l´ ergonomie prospective et du design stratégique dans 12 études de cas
【2h】

Les contours de líntervention en ergonomie prospective: Analyse comparative de l´ ergonomie prospective et du design stratégique dans 12 études de cas

机译:预期人机工程学的干预措施轮廓:在12个案例研究中对预期人机工程学和策略设计的比较分析

摘要

This dissertation argues for a prospective turn in ergonomics to challenge the established fields of strategic design (SD) and management. Differences, similarities and relationships between strategic design and prospective ergonomics are being reviewed using existing theories and frameworks from design, ergonomics, strategic and innovation management. To complement the theoretical part, 12 cases have been analysed in greater depth according to 4 main dimensions of analysis. Outcomes have ishown that innovating through PE approach is about finding the right balance between on one hand meeting primary objectives, such as profit maximisation or solving the design problem, and on the other hand achieving social and human well-being, personal interest and ambitions, family relations, etc. Intervention of prospective ergonomics within a classical strategy perspective requires organizations to couple push-pull market strategies while considering the interest of different stakeholders throughout all stages of the development process. This means that prescriptive approaches, methods and tools in the positivist mode should be complemented with constructive modes of reasoning and designing as well as reflective methods and tools, while taking into consideration all levels and perspectives of value creation. From an educational perspective, the transfer of design knowledge and skills requires a mentorship and scholarship approach in research-, or practice-based learning, which implies a hermeneutic, reflective and participatory mode of design reasoning within a constructivist worldview.
机译:本文提出了人机工程学的前瞻性挑战,挑战了既定的战略设计和管理领域。正在使用来自设计,人体工程学,战略和创新管理的现有理论和框架来审查战略设计与预期人体工程学之间的差异,相似性和关系。为了补充理论部分,根据4个主要分析维度对12个案例进行了更深入的分析。结果表明,通过PE方法进行创新是要在一方面实现主要目标(例如实现利润最大化或解决设计问题)之间取得适当的平衡,另一方面实现社会和人类的福祉,个人兴趣和抱负,家庭关系等。在经典策略视角下干预前瞻性人体工程学要求组织在研究开发过程的所有阶段时,在考虑不同利益相关者的利益的同时,结合推拉市场策略。这意味着,在实证主义模式下的规定性方法,方法和工具应与推理和设计的建设性模式以及反思性方法和工具相辅相成,同时要考虑到价值创造的所有层面和观点。从教育的角度来看,设计知识和技能的转移需要以研究或实践为基础的学习中的指导和奖学金方法,这意味着在建构主义世界观下的设计推理的诠释性,反思性和参与性模式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Liem Andre;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号