...
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy of Science >There Is No Asymmetry of Identity Assumptions in the Debate over Selection and Individuals
【24h】

There Is No Asymmetry of Identity Assumptions in the Debate over Selection and Individuals

机译:关于选择和个人的辩论中没有身份假设的不对称性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A long-running dispute concerns which adaptation-related explananda natural selection can be said to explain. (The issue is conceptual-not empirical-and orthogonal adaptationism.) At issue are explananda of the form: why a given individual organism has a given adaptation rather than that same individual having another trait It is broadly agreed that one must be ready to back up a "no" answer with an appropriate theory of trans-world identity for individuals. I argue, against the conventional wisdom, that the same is true for a "yes" answer. My conclusion recasts the landscape and opens the door to a potential resolution.
机译:长期争论的焦点可以说是与适应有关的解释自然选择。 (问题是概念上的,不是经验上的,而是正交的适应主义。)所讨论的是形式的解释:为什么给定的个体生物具有给定的适应能力,而不是具有另一个特征的同一个个体普遍同意,一个人必须准备好支持用适合个人的跨世界身份理论来回答“不”。我反对传统观点认为,对“是”的答案也是如此。我的结论重塑了景观,并为可能的解决方案打开了大门。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号