...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmaceutical medicine >Standardizing the Benefit-Risk Assessment of New Medicines Practical Applications of Frameworks for the Pharmaceutical Healthcare Professional
【24h】

Standardizing the Benefit-Risk Assessment of New Medicines Practical Applications of Frameworks for the Pharmaceutical Healthcare Professional

机译:规范新药的利益风险评估医药保健专业人员框架的实际应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pharmaceutical scientists and healthcare professionals participating in the development of new medicines bring important practical perspectives to the evaluation of benefits and risks. Within pharmaceutical companies, these specialists can serve to inform the benefit-risk (BR) assessment process, particularly in the latter stages of drug development. However, pharmaceutical scientists may not be aware of the current state of activity in the ongoing efforts to standardize the BR assessment process. In this article, we discuss the role of BR assessment frameworks, activities that are underpinning the standardization of these approaches, and suggest considerations for pharmaceutical scientists to incorporate these into medicine development programmes, regulatory dossiers and clinician communications. Over the past decade there has been an increasing awareness of the potential benefits that can derive from the use of a standardized methodology to assess and communicate a product's BR profile. Frameworks (in this context defined as the tools and guidelines for their use to facilitate communication of benefits and risks) being developed by the European Medicines Agency, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Benefit-Risk Action Team (PhRMA BRAT) initiative and the Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Sciences (CIRS), share a common basis in multi-criteria decision analysis and are introduced in this article. To date, quantitative approaches to BR have been used cautiously because they have lacked the appropriate sophistication, flexibility, ease of use and ability to communicate BR findings. As a result, while a number of quantitative methods have been developed, none have yet achieved widespread endorsement or adoption. Nevertheless, weighting and valuing the underlying criteria can drive a more visual-based presentation of the results, such as through the use of forest plots. BR criteria can be applied to all stage-gate decisions in the lifecycle of ...
机译:参与新药开发的药物科学家和医疗保健专业人员为评估收益和风险带来了重要的实践观点。在制药公司内部,这些专家可以为利益风险(BR)评估过程提供信息,尤其是在药物开发的后期。但是,在继续进行BR评估流程标准化的努力中,药物科学家可能并不了解当前的活动状态。在本文中,我们讨论了BR评估框架的作用,支撑这些方法标准化的活动,并提出了制药科学家应考虑的考虑因素,以将其纳入药物开发计划,监管卷宗和临床医生交流中。在过去的十年中,人们越来越意识到使用标准化方法来评估和传达产品的BR概况可能带来的潜在好处。欧洲药物管理局,美国药物研究和制造商利益风险行动小组(PhRMA BRAT)计划和中心正在开发框架(在此背景下,定义为使用这些工具和准则以促进利益和风险的交流)对于监管科学创新(CIRS),在多标准决策分析中有着共同的基础,本文将对此进行介绍。迄今为止,对BR的定量方法已经谨慎使用,因为它们缺乏适当的复杂性,灵活性,易用性和传达BR发现的能力。结果,尽管已经开发了许多定量方法,但是还没有一种方法得到广泛认可或采用。但是,加权和评估基本标准可以推动结果的可视化呈现,例如通过使用林地。 BR标准可以应用于...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号