首页> 外文期刊>Pedosphere: A Quarterly Journal of Soil Science >A modified model of ecological footprint accounting and its application to cropland in Jiangsu, China
【24h】

A modified model of ecological footprint accounting and its application to cropland in Jiangsu, China

机译:生态足迹核算的改进模型及其在江苏省耕地中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Based on the theory of emergy analysis, a modified model of ecological footprint accounting, termed emergetic ecological footprint (EMEF) in contrast to the conventional ecological footprint (EF) model, is formulated and applied to a case study of Jiangsu cropland China. Comparisons between the EF and the EMEF with respect to grain, cotton, and food oil were outlined. Per capita EF and EMEF of cropland were also presented to depict the resources consumption level by comparing the biocapacity (BC) or emergetic biocapacity (EMBC, a new BC calculation by emergy analysis) of the same area. In the meanwhile, the ecological sustainability index (ESI), a new concept initiated by the authors, was established in the modified model to indicate and compare the sustainability of cropland use at different levels and between different regions. The results from conventional EF showed that per capita EF of the cropland has exceeded its per capita BC in Jiangsu since 1986. In contrast, based on the EMBC, the per capita EMEF exceeded the per capita EMBC 5 years earlier. The ESIs of Jiangsu cropland use were between 0.7 and 0.4 by the conventional method, while the numbers were between 0.7 and 0.3 by the modified one. The fact that the results of the two methods were similar showed that the modified model was reasonable and feasible, although some principles of the EF and EMEF were quite different. Also, according to the realities of Jiangsu' cropland use, the results from the modified model were more acceptable.
机译:基于能值分析理论,建立了与传统的生态足迹(EF)模型相反的,被称为“新兴生态足迹”(EMEF)的生态足迹核算模型,并将其应用于中国江苏省耕地的案例研究。概述了EF和EMEF在谷物,棉花和食用油方面的比较。还通过比较同一地区的生物承载力(BC)或新兴生物承载力(EMBC,通过能值分析计算出的新的BC),提出了农田的人均EF和EMEF,以描述资源消耗水平。同时,在修改后的模型中建立了作者提出的新概念生态可持续性指数(ESI),以指示和比较不同级别和不同区域之间农田使用的可持续性。传统EF的结果显示,自1986年以来,江苏省耕地的人均EF已超过其人均BC。相反,基于EMBC,人均EMEF超过了5年前的人均EMBC。江苏省耕地利用的ESIs按常规方法在0.7至0.4之间,而改良方法在0.7至0.3之间。两种方法的结果相似的事实表明,尽管EF和EMEF的某些原理完全不同,但修改后的模型是合理可行的。而且,根据江苏省耕地利用的现实情况,修改后的模型的结果更为可接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号