...
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine >Vaccination-induced syphilis and the Hübner malpractice litigation
【24h】

Vaccination-induced syphilis and the Hübner malpractice litigation

机译:疫苗引起的梅毒和赫伯纳医疗事故诉讼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines smallpox vaccination in the 19th century as background for a notorious medical malpractice case that occupied Bavarian courts from April 1853 until May 1854. Dr. Georg Hübner, the defendant, was accused of having initiated a small epidemic of syphilis by using the lymph of a syphilitic infant to vaccinate 13 infants. The litigation and its published contemporaneous discussion demonstrate conflicts in the understanding of syphilis, the hazards of having to make a purely clinical diagnosis, the effect of obsolete legal wording in medical litigation, and the attitude of leading physicians to a guilty colleague. This case ultimately led to efforts to make arm-to-arm smallpox vaccination safer, and by 1898 to abandon the technique in favor of bovine sources that were sterilized and stabilized by various methods.
机译:本文研究了19世纪天花疫苗的接种情况,该情况是1853年4月至1854年5月占领巴伐利亚法院的一个臭名昭著的医疗事故案的背景。被告GeorgHübner博士被指控使用淋巴结引发了小规模的梅毒流行梅毒婴儿接种疫苗给13名婴儿接种。诉讼及其同时期的讨论表明,在梅毒理解上存在冲突,必须进行纯临床诊断的危害,医疗诉讼中过时的法律用语的影响以及领先的医生对有罪同僚的态度。该病例最终导致人们努力使手臂间的天花疫苗更安全,并于1898年放弃了该技术,而采用了经各种方法灭菌和稳定的牛源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号