首页> 外文期刊>Sustinability: The Journal of Record >Crossing Disciplines To Address Urban Sustainability
【24h】

Crossing Disciplines To Address Urban Sustainability

机译:跨学科解决城市可持续性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents findings from the evaluation of Bridging the Gaps: Sustainable Urban Spaces (BTG), a novel interdisciplinary sustainability research funding program at University College London (UCL), funded by the United Kingdom Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). All of the EPSRCs Bridging the Gaps programs aim to initiate and support interdisciplinary collaboration within a university. The program at UCL was designed to create research partnerships that focus on problems in the area of sustainable urban spaces, an area that features complex problems that often overlap different academic disciplines. The program initially focused on building relationships within the three UCL faculties: The Bartlett Faculty of the BuiltEnvironment, The Faculty of Engineering Sciences, and The Faculty of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, but subsequently brought in participants from other faculties. Bridging the Gaps has brought together researchers working on different elements of aproblem, allowing each of them to contribute approaches from their own discipline. This paper presents feedback from participants in the program. Respondents discuss their experience in cross disciplinary working and its importance for their work. We address the question of whether the benefits are outweighed by the complexities of crossing disciplines, and we investigate the role that programs like BTG can play in making the process easier. We also discuss the challenge of creating the conditions forinterdisciplinary work and ways in which we can use our experience to minimize the barriers of crossing disciplines in the future.
机译:本文介绍了“缩小差距:可持续城市空间”(BTG)的评估结果,这是由英国工程与物理科学研究委员会(EPSRC)资助的伦敦大学学院(UCL)跨学科的新型可持续性研究资助计划。所有EPSRC的缩小差距计划都旨在发起和支持大学内部的跨学科合作。 UCL的计划旨在建立研究合作伙伴关系,重点放在可持续城市空间领域的问题上,该地区的特点是复杂的问题往往与不同的学科重叠。该计划最初侧重于在三个UCL系中建立关系:建筑环境的Bartlett系,工程科学系和数学与物理科学系,但随后吸引了其他系的参与者。缩小差距使研究人员聚集在解决问题的不同元素上,使他们每个人都可以根据自己的学科贡献方法。本文介绍了该计划参与者的反馈。受访者讨论了他们在跨学科工作中的经验及其对他们工作的重要性。我们解决的问题是,跨学科的复杂性是否会超过收益,并且我们研究了BTG等程序在简化流程中可以发挥的作用。我们还将讨论为跨学科工作创造条件的挑战,以及我们可以利用我们的经验来最大程度地减少将来跨学科障碍的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号