...
首页> 外文期刊>Sleep >Comparative effects of two oral appliances on upper airway structure in obstructive sleep apnea
【24h】

Comparative effects of two oral appliances on upper airway structure in obstructive sleep apnea

机译:两种口服矫治器对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停上呼吸道结构的比较作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Objectives: Oral appliances are increasingly being used for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Mandibular advancement splint (MAS) mechanically protrudes the mandible, while the tongue stabilizing device (TSD) protrudes and holds the tongue using suction. Although both appliances can significantly improve or ameliorate OSA, their comparative effects on upper airway structure have not been investigated. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Sleep Investigation Unit. Patients: 39 patients undergoing oral appliance treatment for OSA. Interventions: OSA patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper airway during wakefulness at baseline and with MAS and TSD in randomized order. Treatment efficacy was determined by polysomnography in a subset of 18 patients. Measurements and Results: Upper airway lumen and surrounding soft tissue structures were segmented using image analysis software. Upper airway dimensions and soft tissue centroid movements were determined. Both appliances altered upper airway geometry, associated with movement of the parapharyngeal fat pads away from the airway. TSD increased velopharyngeal lateral diameter to a greater extent (+0.35 ± 0.07 vs. +0.18 ± 0.05 cm; P 0.001) and also increased antero-posterior diameter with anterior displacement of the tongue (0.68 ± 0.04 cm; P 0.001) and soft palate (0.12 ± 0.03 cm; P 0.001). MAS resulted in significant anterior displacement of the tongue base muscles (0.35 ± 0.04 cm). TSD responders (AHI reduction ≥ 50%) increased velopharyngeal volume more than non-responders (+2.65 ± 0.9 vs. -0.44 ± 0.8 cm 3; P 0.05). Airway structures did not differ between MAS responders and non-responders. Conclusions: These results indicate that the patterns and magnitude of changes in upper airway structure differ between appliances. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical relevance of these changes, and whether they can be used to predict treatment outcome.
机译:研究目标:口腔矫治器正越来越多地用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的治疗。下颌前移夹板(MAS)机械伸出下颌骨,而舌头稳定装置(TSD)伸出并用吸力固定住舌头。尽管两种器具都可以显着改善或改善OSA,但尚未研究它们对上呼吸道结构的比较效果。设计:队列研究。地点:睡眠调查部。患者:39例接受OSA口腔矫治器治疗的患者。干预措施:OSA患者在基线清醒时接受上呼吸道磁共振成像(MRI),并随机接受MAS和TSD。通过多导睡眠图测定18例患者的治疗效果。测量和结果:使用图像分析软件对上呼吸道内腔和周围软组织结构进行分割。确定上呼吸道尺寸和软组织质心运动。两种器具都改变了上呼吸道的几何形状,这与咽旁脂肪垫远离气道的运动有关。 TSD更大程度地增加了咽咽侧向直径(+0.35±0.07 vs. + 0.18±0.05 cm; P <0.001),并且随着舌头的前移而增加了前后牙的直径(0.68±0.04 cm; P <0.001)和软pa(0.12±0.03 cm; P <0.001)。 MAS导致舌基肌明显向前移位(0.35±0.04 cm)。 TSD响应者(AHI降低≥50%)比无响应者增加了咽喉体积(+2.65±0.9对-0.44±0.8 cm 3; P <0.05)。 MAS响应者和非响应者之间的气道结构没有差异。结论:这些结果表明,上呼吸道结构变化的模式和幅度在不同装置之间有所不同。有必要进行进一步的研究来评估这些变化的临床相关性,以及是否可以将其用于预测治疗结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号