首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Initial clinical experience with a remote magnetic catheter navigation system for ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter.
【24h】

Initial clinical experience with a remote magnetic catheter navigation system for ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter.

机译:远程磁导管导航系统消融左室峡部依赖右心房扑动的初步临床经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: A remote magnetic navigation system (MNS) is available and has been used with a 4-mm-tip magnetic catheter for radiofrequency (RF) ablation of some supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias; however, it has not been evaluated for the ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter (AFL). The present study evaluates the feasibility and efficiency of this system and the newly available 8-mm-tip magnetic catheter to perform RF ablation in patients with AFL. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients (23 men, mean age 64.6 +/- 9.6 years) underwent RF ablation using a remote MNS. RF ablation was performed with an 8-mm-tip magnetic catheter (70 degrees C, maximum power 70 W, 90 seconds). The endpoint of ablation was complete bidirectional isthmus block. To assess a possible learning curve, procedural data were compared between the first 14 (group 1) and the rest (group 2) of the patients. RESULTS: The initial rhythm during ablation was AFL in 20 (19 counterclockwise and 1 clockwise) and sinus rhythm in six patients. Due to technical issues, the ablation in the 18th patient could not be done with the MNS, and so we switched to conventional ablation. The remote magnetic navigation and ablation procedure was successful in 24 of the 25 (96%) remaining patients with AFL. In one patient (patient 2), conventional catheter was used to complete the isthmus block after termination of AFL. The procedure, preparation, ablation, and fluoroscopy times (median [range]) were 53 (30-130) minutes, 28 (10-65) minutes, 25 (12-78) minutes, and 7.5 (3.2-20.8) minutes, respectively. Patients in group 2 had shorter procedure (45 [30-70] min vs 80 [57-130] min, P = 0.0001), preparation (25 [10-30] min vs 42 [30-65] min, P 0.0001), ablation (20 [12-40] min vs 31 [20-78] min, P fluoroscopy (7.2 [3.2-12.2] min vs 11.0 [5.4-20.8] min, P = 0.014) times. No complication occurred during the procedure. CONCLUSION: Using a remote MNS and an 8-mm-tip magnetic catheter, ablation of AFL is feasible, safe, and effective. Our data suggest that there is a short learning curve for this procedure.
机译:背景:可利用远程磁导航系统(MNS)并与4毫米尖端的电磁导管配合使用,以消融一些室上和室性心律失常的射频(RF)。但是,尚无消融治疗左室地峡依赖的右房扑(AFL)的评估。本研究评估了该系统和新近可用的8毫米尖端电磁导管在AFL患者中进行射频消融的可行性和效率。方法:使用远程MNS对26例连续患者(23名男性,平均年龄64.6 +/- 9.6岁)进行了射频消融。用8毫米尖端的电磁导管(70摄氏度,最大功率70瓦,90秒)进行射频消融。消融的终点是完全的双向峡部阻滞。为了评估可能的学习曲线,比较了前14名患者(第1组)和其余患者(第2组)的手术数据。结果:消融期间的初始节律为20例AFL(逆时针为19个,顺时针为1个),六例患者的窦性心律。由于技术问题,第18例患者无法使用MNS消融,因此我们改用常规消融。剩余的25名AFL患者中有24名(96%)成功进行了远程磁导航和消融手术。在一名患者(患者2)中,AFL终止后,使用常规导管完成峡部阻滞。程序,准备,消融和荧光检查时间(中位[范围])分别为53(30-130)分钟,28(10-65)分钟,25(12-78)分钟和7.5(3.2-20.8)分钟,分别。第2组患者的手术时间较短(45 [30-70] min vs 80 [57-130] min,P = 0.0001),准备时间较短(25 [10-30] min vs 42 [30-65] min,P 0.0001) ,消融(20 [12-40]分钟vs 31 [20-78]分钟,P透视)(7.2 [3.2-12.2]分钟vs 11.0 [5.4-20.8]分钟,P = 0.014)次。结论:使用远端MNS和8毫米尖端的电磁导管消融AFL是可行,安全和有效的,我们的数据表明该方法的学习曲线较短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号