...
首页> 外文期刊>Subjectivity >The Subject, the Real and the question of form: A return to historical materialism
【24h】

The Subject, the Real and the question of form: A return to historical materialism

机译:主题,实在和形式问题:回归历史唯物主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

What Zizek has dubbed 'the parallax view' is here developed with reference to Marx's labour theory of value and commodity fetishism in an attempt to show that dividing historical materialism into 'dialectical' and 'historical' camps is at best an analytic distinction, at worst a mechanical and false one. In emphasizing that the Subject is a product of the Symbolic, and yet the Symbolic is the product of the Subject, it can be seen that one cannot do history without simultaneously talking about the forms of consciousness that are in effect the historical, changing face of the Subject itself. This can be seen not only in Capital, but also in Marx's 'political works' - this is argued by turning to Zizek's discussion of Class Struggles in France. This is contrary to a Lacanian-inspired reading of historical materialism in which the Real is prioritized and taken as a primordial generator of the Symbolic order as well as readings of Zizek's work that miss the significance of 'parallax'.
机译:Zizek称之为“视差视图”的内容是在参照马克思的劳动价值论和商品拜物教理论的基础上发展起来的,试图表明将历史唯物主义划分为“辩证”和“历史”阵营充其量是一种分析性的区分,最坏的情况是机械的和虚假的。在强调主体是象征的产物,而象征是主体的产物时,可以看出,如果不同时谈论实际上是意识形态的历史变化面孔的意识形式,就不能做历史。主体本身。这不仅可以在《资本论》中看到,而且可以在马克思的“政治著作”中看到-这是通过转向齐泽克在法国对阶级斗争的讨论而得出的。这与拉康主义启发的对历史唯物主义的解读相反,在唯读主义中,以真实为优先,并被认为是象征秩序的原始生成者,而齐泽克的作品则忽略了“视差”的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号