...
【24h】

Minilaparoscopic appendectomy.

机译:微型腹腔镜阑尾切除术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 2-mm laparoscopic instruments in the treatment of appendicitis and to identify risk factors that may limit their use. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was performed through a 2-mm port in the umbilicus for a videoendoscope, a 2-mm working port in the right upper quadrant, and a 5/12-mm suprapubic port for an endoscopic stapler. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was attempted in 26 consecutive patients with appendicitis. Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic appendectomy with 5- and 10-mm instruments and videoendoscopes before the availability of 2-mm instrumentation were analyzed for comparison. Statistical comparisons were made by the Student t test and Fisher exact test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a P value less than 0.05. There were no conversions to an open appendectomy in the minilaparoscopic appendectomy or conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group. The mean operative time was 69.5 minutes for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 85.5 minutes for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.02). The mean postoperative length of stay was 1.7 days for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 2.5 days for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the complication rates (P = 0.31). Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was completed in 13 (50.0%) patients. Independent risk factors (P = 0.05) for conversion to 5- or 10-mm ports were a retrocecal appendix and increasing patient age. There were no differences in the mean postoperative length of stay (P = 0.12) or complication rate (P = 0.39) between the two groups, but mean operative time was longer (P = 0.05) in the converted group. Perioperative outcomes for minilaparoscopic appendectomy are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. The use of 2-mm instrumentation in the management of appendicitis is limited in patients with retrocecal appendicitis. Increasing patient age and a history of abdominal surgery may influence the need to convert 2-mm ports to 5- or 10-mm ports.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估使用2毫米腹腔镜器械治疗阑尾炎的可行性,并确定可能限制其使用的危险因素。微型腹腔镜阑尾切除术是通过脐带的2毫米端口(用于视频内窥镜),2毫米的工作端口(位于右上象限)和5/12毫米的耻骨上耻骨端口(用于内窥镜缝合器)进行的。连续26例阑尾炎患者尝试进行小型腹腔镜阑尾切除术。分析了连续的22例接受2毫米仪器的患者使用5毫米和10毫米仪器以及视频内窥镜进行常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术的情况,以进行比较。通过Student t检验和Fisher精确检验进行统计比较。 P值小于0.05时,差异被认为具有统计学意义。在小型腹腔镜阑尾切除术组或常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术组中没有转换为开放性阑尾切除术。微型腹腔镜阑尾切除术组的平均手术时间为69.5分钟,常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术组的平均手术时间为85.5分钟(P = 0.02)。小型腹腔镜阑尾切除术组的平均术后住院时间为1.7天,常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术组为2.5天(P = 0.08)。并发症发生率无显着差异(P = 0.31)。 13例(50.0%)患者完成了小型腹腔镜阑尾切除术。转换为5毫米或10毫米端口的独立危险因素(P = 0.05)是盲肠后阑尾并增加了患者年龄。两组之间的平均术后住院时间(P = 0.12)或并发症发生率(P = 0.39)没有差异,但转换组的平均手术时间更长(P = 0.05)。小型腹腔镜阑尾切除术的围手术期结果与常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术相当。对于盲肠性阑尾炎患者,使用2-mm器械治疗阑尾炎受到限制。患者年龄的增加和腹部手术的历史可能会影响将2毫米端口转换为5或10毫米端口的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号