...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical speciation and bioavailability >The mobility and bioavailability of trace metals in tropical soils: a review
【24h】

The mobility and bioavailability of trace metals in tropical soils: a review

机译:热带土壤中微量金属的迁移率和生物利用度:综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years, initiatives on critical loads of metals have resulted in the development of models to predict critical, i.e. mobile or bioavailable, concentrations of potentially toxic elements in soils. These models have been based on data from temperate soils and, considering the fundamentally different soil chemistry of the major tropical soil types, it is unlikely that such models could be applied successfully in the tropics. In particular, the major tropical soil types, particularly oxisols and ultisols, are distinguished from most temperate soils by low activity clays, low organic matter contents, low pH values and high levels of Fe oxides. The aim of this review paper is to collate existing information on the behaviour of trace metals in tropical soils, particularly in relation to metal mobility and bioavailability, and note differences, where these exist, with temperate soils. The main findings are as follows. The acidic nature of many tropical soils may not, of itself, lead to greater metal solubility. The relatively low organic matter content of tropical soils suggests that it cannot be relied upon to retain metals. However, when it is present, it appears to be important in the retention of copper, lead and zinc. The clay fractions of many tropical soils are dominated by kaolinite which is less able than 2: 1 layer silicate clays to adsorb metals. However, oxisols and ultisols in particular have relatively high Fe oxides contents and these may be effective in metal sorption. Overall though, soils such as oxisols and ultisols appear to sorb relatively low amounts of added metals, most likely explained by the low activity clay minerals they contain and the rapid decomposition of organic matter incorporated into them. Dominant retention mechanisms, where they occur, are inner and outer sphere adsorption but not precipitation. Cadmium, Cu, Zn and Ni appear to be mobile in tropical soils. Chromium may be mobile in the A horizon but retained in the B horizon. The evidence for Pb points to surface retention, as is often observed for this metal in temperate soils. Metals in contaminated tropical soils appear to be rather bioavailable, judging by the few studies on plant uptake. It should be noted that the above statements are based on a relatively small number of studies. Further work is required if we are to gain an improved understanding of the mobility and bioavailability of trace metals in tropical soils.
机译:近年来,关于关键金属负载的倡议导致了模型的开发,以预测土壤中潜在的有毒元素的关键(即移动或生物利用度)的浓度。这些模型基于温带土壤的数据,并且考虑到主要热带土壤类型的根本化学性质不同,此类模型不太可能在热带地区成功应用。特别是,主要的热带土壤类型,尤其是羟乙醛和多酚,与大多数温带土壤的区别在于低活性粘土,低有机质含量,低pH值和高含量的Fe氧化物。本文的目的是整理有关热带土壤中痕量金属行为的现有信息,特别是与金属迁移率和生物利用度有关的信息,并指出与温带土壤存在的差异。主要发现如下。许多热带土壤的酸性性质本身可能不会导致更大的金属溶解度。热带土壤中有机物含量较低,这表明不能依靠它来保留金属。但是,当存在时,它似乎对保留铜,铅和锌很重要。在许多热带土壤中,粘土成分以高岭土为主,而高岭石的吸附能力低于2:1层的硅酸盐粘土。然而,尤其是乙二醛和多异丙醇具有较高的Fe氧化物含量,并且这些在金属吸附方面可能是有效的。总体而言,土壤如oxisols和ultisols似乎吸收相对少量的添加金属,这很可能是由于它们所含的低活性粘土矿物质以及其中所含有机物的快速分解所致。发生保留的主要机制是内球和外球吸附,而不是沉淀。镉,铜,锌和镍在热带土壤中似乎是可移动的。铬在A层中可能是可移动的,但在B层中可以保留。铅的证据表明其表面保持力,正如在温带土壤中经常观察到的那样。根据对植物吸收的少量研究判断,被污染的热带土壤中的金属似乎具有较高的生物利用度。应当指出,以上陈述是基于相对较少的研究。如果我们要加深对热带土壤中微量金属的迁移率和生物利用度的了解,则需要进一步的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号