首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Clinical outcomes in middle cerebral artery trunk occlusions versus secondary division occlusions after mechanical thrombectomy: pooled analysis of the Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) and Multi MERCI trials.
【24h】

Clinical outcomes in middle cerebral artery trunk occlusions versus secondary division occlusions after mechanical thrombectomy: pooled analysis of the Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) and Multi MERCI trials.

机译:机械血栓切除术后大脑中动脉主干闭塞与继发分区闭塞的临床结局:脑缺血(MERCI)和Multi MERCI试验中机械栓塞去除的综合分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The benefit of endovascular revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke with middle cerebral artery (MCA) secondary division (M2) occlusions as compared with MCA trunk (M1) occlusions is not known. In this analysis, we compared revascularization status and clinical outcomes in patients with angiographically confirmed MCA M1 versus isolated M2 occlusions treated with mechanical thrombectomy using the Merci Retriever devices. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the pooled data of patients with MCA strokes from the Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) and Multi MERCI trials. Patient data were dichotomized into 2 groups: MCA M1 occlusions and isolated M2 occlusions. Baseline characteristics, revascularization rates, hemorrhage rates, complications, outcomes, and mortality were evaluated for both groups. RESULTS: Of 178 patients with MCA occlusion treated in the MERCI and Multi MERCI trials, 84.3% had M1 lesions and 15.7% had isolated M2 lesions. Patients with isolated M2 occlusions were revascularized at a higher rate, required a lower mean number of passes, and were associated with a trend toward shorter mean procedure time than patients with M1 occlusions. No statistically significant differences were found between M2 and M1 groups for symptomatic hemorrhage, clinically significant procedural adverse events, favorable 90-day outcome, or 90-day mortality, although in all instances, the M2 outcomes were numerically better than those in M1 subjects. In multivariate analysis, final revascularization was the strongest independent predictor of good outcome at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with both MCA M1 occlusions and isolated M2 occlusions can achieve a relatively high rate of revascularization and favorable clinical outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy. In fact, patients with isolated M2 occlusions had a higher rate of revascularization, required fewer passes, and had no increased complications compared with patients with M1 occlusions.
机译:背景与目的:与MCA干线(M1)闭塞相比,急性缺血性卒中伴大脑中动脉(MCA)二级分裂(M2)闭塞的患者进行血管内血运重建的益处尚不清楚。在这项分析中,我们比较了使用Merci Retriever装置通过机械血栓切除术进行血管造影确诊的MCA M1患者与孤立M2闭塞患者的血运重建状况和临床结局。方法:我们回顾性分析了来自脑缺血性机械性栓塞切除术(MERCI)和Multi MERCI试验的MCA卒中患者的汇总数据。将患者数据分为两类:MCA M1闭塞和孤立的M2闭塞。评估两组的基线特征,血运重建率,出血率,并发症,结局和死亡率。结果:在MERCI和Multi MERCI试验中治疗的178名MCA闭塞患者中,有84.3%患有M1病变,而15.7%患有孤立的M2病变。与M1闭塞患者相比,孤立的M2闭塞患者的血运重建率更高,需要的平均通过次数更低,并且平均手术时间趋于缩短。 M2和M1组之间在症状性出血,临床上明显的程序性不良事件,有利的90天结果或90天死亡率方面没有发现统计学上的显着差异,尽管在所有情况下,M2结果在数值上都比M1受试者好。在多变量分析中,最终血运重建是90天良好预后的最强独立预测因子。结论:机械血栓切除术后,MCA M1闭塞和孤立的M2闭塞的患者可以实现较高的血运重建率和良好的临床效果。实际上,与M1闭塞患者相比,孤立的M2闭塞患者的血运重建率更高,需要的通行次数更少,并且并发症没有增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号