首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Within-day and weekly variations of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: Results from safe implementation of treatments in stroke-international stroke thrombolysis register
【24h】

Within-day and weekly variations of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: Results from safe implementation of treatments in stroke-international stroke thrombolysis register

机译:急性缺血性卒中的每日和每周溶栓治疗变化:安全实施卒中治疗的结果-国际卒中溶栓登记册

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Purpose-Temporal variations of thrombolysis delivery and their influence on outcome have been reported with controversial results. In this large cohort study, we evaluated whether thrombolytic treatment has a within-day and weekly variability corresponding to circadian and weekly patterns of ischemic stroke onset, and whether these have impact on clinical outcome. Methods-We retrospectively analyzed patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous alteplase, prospectively included in the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register. Patients were grouped by treatment on day hours (08:00-19:59) or night hours (20:00-07:59) and treatment on weekdays and weekends. For each subgroup, we analyzed frequency of thrombolytic treatments, time intervals, and outcomes (3-month modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 as good functional outcome, mortality, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage). Results-We included 21 513 patients. Considering the mean expected number of patients treated per hour (0.4) and per day of the week (9.8), if no temporal variations were present, patients were significantly treated more during day hours and weekdays (P<0.0001). Median door-to-needle and onset-to-treatment times were longer for patients treated during night hours and on weekends (P<0.01). After adjustment for confounding variables, treatment during day hours was an independent predictor of good functional outcome (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.21; P=0.004), and patients treated during weekdays were at risk of higher mortality (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.28; P=0.008). Conclusions-Frequency of thrombolytic treatment seems to follow the same circadian pattern of stroke incidence, whereas its correspondence to a weekly pattern is less clear. Time of treatment is an independent predictor of outcome.
机译:据报道,溶栓治疗的背景和目的-时变及其对结果的影响引起争议。在这项大型队列研究中,我们评估了溶栓治疗是否具有与缺血性卒中发作的昼夜节律和每周模式相对应的日内和周内变异性,以及这些是否对临床结局有影响。方法-我们回顾性分析了接受静脉注射阿替普酶治疗的急性缺血性中风患者,这些患者有望纳入《中风治疗安全实施》-《国际中风溶栓治疗登记册》。按照白天(08:00-19:59)或夜间(20:00-07:59)的治疗将患者分组,并在工作日和周末进行治疗。对于每个亚组,我们分析了溶栓治疗的频率,时间间隔和结局(3个月改良的Rankin量表评分0-2为良好的功能结局,死亡率,有症状的脑出血)。结果-我们纳入21 513名患者。考虑每小时(0.4)和每周(9.8)的平均预期患者人数,如果不存在时间差异,则患者在白天和工作日的治疗量显着增加(P <0.0001)。在夜间和周末接受治疗的患者,门到针的中位时间和开始治疗的时间更长(P <0.01)。在对混杂变量进行调整后,白天的治疗是功能预后良好的独立预测指标(优势比为1.12; 95%置信区间为1.04-1.21; P = 0.004),并且在工作日接受治疗的患者有更高的死亡风险(比值比为1.15; 95%置信区间为1.04-1.28; P = 0.008)。结论溶栓治疗的频率似乎遵循相同的昼夜节律发生的昼夜节律模式,但与每周模式的对应关系尚不清楚。治疗时间是结果的独立预测因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号