...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection.
【24h】

Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection.

机译:盲法和透视引导下硬膜外硬膜外注射的准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study of a case series of patients with low back pain referred for epidural injection of corticosteroid. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of caudal epidural injections performed without the use of fluoroscopic guidance and to determine the value of specific clinical tests performed during the procedure in predicting successful epidural needle placement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Epidural injection of corticosteroid is one of many treatments currently used in the nonsurgical management of low back pain. The face validity of many studies evaluating the efficacy of epidural corticosteroid injections has been criticized for use of a blind technique. Although there currently is no consensus in the spine literature as to whether epidural injection of corticosteroid (by any technique) is effective, it is imperative first to establish the accuracy of the technique being used. METHODS: A total of 54 consecutive patients underwent fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections. Needle insertion was performed blindly (without the use of fluoroscopic guidance), and the success of needle placement was predicted according to the presence of palpable landmarks, palpation of subcutaneous airflow, and the subjective impression that the needle was in a satisfactory position. These clinical criteria then were compared with the position of the needle as seen under fluoroscopy and the spread of radio-opaque contrast in the epidural space after the procedure. RESULTS: Successful injection placement on the first attempt occurred in 74.1% of the patients. Results were improved when anatomic landmarks were identified easily (87.5%) and no air was palpable subcutaneously over the sacrum when injected through the needle (82.9%). The combination of these two signs predicted a successful injection in 91.3% of attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal epidural injection is performed ideally with fluoroscopic guidance as the gold standard for accurate drug placement. If fluoroscopic guidance is unavailable, impractical, or contraindicated, the presence of readily palpable anatomic landmarks at the sacral hiatus and the absence of palpable subcutaneous airflow over the sacrum significantly increase the operator's confidence in the likelihood of an accurate injection even before any products are administered into the epidural space.
机译:研究设计:一项前瞻性观察性研究,涉及一组硬膜外注射皮质类固醇激素治疗的下腰痛患者。目的:评估不使用透视引导下进行的硬膜外尾注的准确性,并确定该过程中进行的特定临床测试在预测硬膜外针成功放置方面的价值。背景技术概述:硬膜外注射皮质类固醇激素是当前非手术治疗腰痛的许多治疗方法之一。许多评价硬膜外皮质类固醇注射功效的研究的面部有效性都因使用盲法而受到批评。尽管脊柱文献目前尚无关于硬膜外注射皮质类固醇(通过任何技术)是否有效的共识,但首先必须确定所用技术的准确性。方法:总共54例连续患者接受了透视引导下的硬膜外硬膜外注射。盲注地插入针头(不使用透视引导),根据可触知的界标的存在,皮下气流的触诊以及主观感觉针头处于令人满意的位置,来预测针头放置是否成功。然后将这些临床标准与透视下的针头位置以及手术后硬膜外间隙中不透射线造影剂的扩散情况进行比较。结果:74.1%的患者首次尝试成功注射。通过解剖针轻松识别解剖标志(87.5%),并且通过针头注射时,the骨皮下无空气可见(82.9%),结果得到改善。这两个信号的组合预测成功注射的尝试率为91.3%。结论:理想的是在荧光镜引导下进行尾硬膜外注射,这是准确放置药物的金标准。如果无法使用透视检查,不切实际或禁忌,则在hi裂处容易触及的解剖标志的存在以及over骨上无明显的皮下气流的存在,即使在服用任何产品之前,操作者对准确注射的可能性的信心也大大增加。进入硬膜外腔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号