首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Test-retest reliability of the Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE).
【24h】

Test-retest reliability of the Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE).

机译:等距渐进评估(PILE)的重测信度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A repeated measures single group design. OBJECTIVES: To investigate test-retest reliability of Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation on patients with long lasting musculoskeletal problems related to the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Test-retest reliability has been satisfactory in healthy men. Test-retest reliability for clinical populations has not been reported. METHODS: A total of 31 patients (17 women and 14 men) with long lasting low back pain participated in the study. The patients were tested twice at an interval of 2 days and at the same time of the day. The heaviest load that the patient could lift 4 times was used as outcome measure. RESULTS: The error of measurement indicates that the true result in 95% of cases will be within +/-4.5 kg from the measured value, while the difference between 2 measurements in 95% of cases will be less than 6.4 kg. Intra-class correlation (1,1) was 0.91. CONCLUSIONS: Relative test-retest reliability was high assessed by intra-class correlation, but absolute measurement variability reported as the smallest detectable difference has relevance for the interpretation of clinical test results and should also be considered.
机译:研究设计:重复测量单组设计。目的:探讨进行性等腰肌举升评估对与腰椎有关的长期肌肉骨骼问题的患者的重测信度。背景数据摘要:重测可靠性在健康男性中令人满意。没有关于临床人群的重测信度的报道。方法:共有31例长期持续的下腰痛患者(17例女性和14例男性)参加了该研究。在2天的间隔和一天的同一时间对患者进行了两次测试。患者可以举起4次重物的最大负荷用作结果指标。结果:测量误差表明,在95%的情况下,真实结果与测量值的差值在+/- 4.5 kg之内,而在95%的情况下,两次测量值之差将小于6.4 kg。类内相关性(1,1)为0.91。结论:通过组内相关性评估了相对测试-再测试的可靠性,但是以最小可检测差异报道的绝对测量变异性与临床测试结果的解释有关,也应予以考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号