...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Management patterns in acute low back pain: The role of physical therapy
【24h】

Management patterns in acute low back pain: The role of physical therapy

机译:急性下腰痛的治疗方式:物理治疗的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. To evaluate the relationship between early physical therapy (PT) for acute low back pain and subsequent use of lumbosacral injections, lumbar surgery, and frequent physician office visits for low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Wide practice variations exist in the treatment of acute low back pain. PT has been advocated as an effective treatment in this setting although disagreement exists regarding its purported benefits. Methods. A national 20% sample of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services physician outpatient billing claims was analyzed. Patients were selected who received treatment for low back pain between 2003 and 2004 (n = 439,195). To exclude chronic low back conditions, patients were excluded if they had a prior visit for back pain, lumbosacral injection, or lumbar surgery within the previous year. Main outcome measures were rates of lumbar surgery, lumbosacral injections, and frequent physician office visits for low back pain during the following year. Results. Based on logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratio for undergoing surgery in the group of enrollees that received PT in the acute phase (<4 weeks) compared to those receiving PT in the chronic phase (>3 months) was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.360.41), adjusting for age, sex, diagnosis, treating physician specialty, and comorbidity. The adjusted odds ratio for receiving a lumbosacral injection in the group receiving PT in the acute phase was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.44-0.49), and the adjusted odds ratio for frequent physician office usage in the group receiving PT in the acute phase was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.44-0.50). Conclusion. There was a lower risk of subsequent medical service usage among patients who received PT early after an episode of acute low back pain relative to those who received PT at later times. Medical specialty variations exist regarding early use of PT, with potential underutilization among generalist specialties.
机译:学习规划。回顾性队列研究。目的。若要评估急性下背部疼痛的早期物理治疗(PT)与随后使用腰s注射,腰椎手术以及因下背部疼痛而经常去诊所就诊之间的关系。背景数据摘要。在急性下腰痛的治疗中存在广泛的实践差异。 PT被认为是在这种情况下的一种有效治疗方法,尽管对其声称的益处存在分歧。方法。分析了全国20%的Medicare和Medicaid Services中心医生门诊账单索赔样本。选择在2003年至2004年之间接受腰背痛治疗的患者(n = 439,195)。为了排除慢性腰背疾病,如果患者在前一年内因背痛,腰ac注射或腰椎手术而进行了就诊,则将其排除在外。主要结局指标为第二年的腰椎手术率,腰s部注射率和对下腰痛的频繁医生就诊。结果。根据logistic回归分析,急性期(<4周)接受PT的参与者与慢性期(> 3个月)接受PT的参与者相比,接受手术的校正后优势比为0.38(95%的置信度)区间[CI],0.360.41),调整年龄,性别,诊断,治疗医师专长和合并症。在急性期接受PT的组中接受腰s注射剂的调整后优势比为0.46(95%CI,0.44-0.49),在急性期接受PT的组中经常用于医生办公室的调整后优势比为0.47(95%CI,0.44-0.50)。结论。急性下背痛发作后较早接受PT的患者相对于较晚接受PT的患者,其随后接受医疗服务的风险较低。在PT的早期使用方面存在医学专业差异,通才专业之间可能会利用不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号