首页> 外文期刊>Spinal cord: the official journal of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia >Comparing and contrasting knowledge of pressure ulcer assessment, prevention and management in people with spinal cord injury among nursing staff working in two metropolitan spinal units and rehabilitation medicine training specialists in a three-way comparison
【24h】

Comparing and contrasting knowledge of pressure ulcer assessment, prevention and management in people with spinal cord injury among nursing staff working in two metropolitan spinal units and rehabilitation medicine training specialists in a three-way comparison

机译:在两个大城市脊柱科工作的护理人员和康复医学培训专家进行的三向比较中,比较和对比了脊髓损伤患者的压疮评估,预防和管理知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim:To assess for differences in knowledge of pressure ulcer (PU) prevention and management among nurses working in two metropolitan spinal cord injury (SCI) units, and between nurses and rehabilitation registrars (doctors).Background:There is anecdotal evidence of wide variation in PU management. An understanding of current knowledge is fundamental to evidence-based practice implementation. Methods: This was a prospective survey, using a multiple choice question format developed with nurse wound specialists. A total of 10 questions assessed PU prevention and 10 assessed management. It was distributed to nurses working at the spinal units and rehabilitation registrars. The results from the groups were analysed for similarities and differences using one- and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests and tests for significance of specific linear combinations of group means. Results: The response rate was 79% (19/24) and 71% (20/ 28) from the two SCI units, and 46% (13/28) from doctors. Doctors performed better than nurses on prevention questions (P<0.005) but worse on management (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in management knowledge (P<0.001) between nurses working in the two units but not in prevention knowledge (P<0.5) and interestingly years of experience did not correlate with performance (P<0.2 for prevention and P<0.5 for management questions).Conclusions:Rehabilitation registrars score better in prevention questions, but poorer in management questions, which reflects academic rather than experiential knowledge. There are also differences in management knowledge among nurses, based on work area rather than years of experience. Although knowledge does not necessarily reflect practice, this calls for better standardisation and implementation of wound management pathways.
机译:目的:评估两个大都会脊髓损伤(SCI)部门工作的护士以及护士与康复注册员(医生)之间在压疮(PU)预防和管理方面的知识差异。背景:有各种各样的轶事证据在PU管理中。对当前知识的了解是基于证据的实践实施的基础。方法:这是一项前瞻性调查,使用由护士伤口专家开发的多项选择题格式。共有10个问题评估了PU预防和10个评估了管理。它已分发给在脊柱科和康复注册员处工作的护士。使用单向和双向方差分析(ANOVA)检验以及组均值的特定线性组合的显着性检验,分析了各组的结果之间的异同。结果:两个SCI单位的响应率为79%(19/24)和71%(20/28),医生的响应率为46%(13/28)。在预防问题上,医生的表现优于护士(P <0.005),但在管理上却较差(P <0.05)。在两个部门工作的护士之间,管理知识方面存在显着差异(P <0.001),但预防知识方面则无显着差异(P <0.5),有趣的是,多年的经验与绩效无关(预防P <0.2,P <0.5结论:康复注册服务商在预防性问题上得分较高,但在管理性问题上得分较低,这反映了学术知识而非经验知识。护士之间的管理知识也有所不同,这取决于工作领域而不是经验的基础。尽管知识不一定能反映实践,但这需要更好地标准化和实施伤口处理途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号