...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Evaluation of the thoracolumbar injury classification system in thoracic and lumbar spinal trauma.
【24h】

Evaluation of the thoracolumbar injury classification system in thoracic and lumbar spinal trauma.

机译:胸腰椎损伤中胸腰椎损伤分类系统的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the relationship among the neurologic status, the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System (TLICS) score, and the Magerl/AO classification system. SUMMARY OF THE BACKGROUND DATA: A wide range of classification schemes for thoracic and lumbar spine trauma have been described, but none has achieved widespread acceptance. A recent system proposed by Vaccaro et al has been developed to improve injury classification and guide surgical decision making. METHODS: Analysis of 49 patients treated surgically for thoracic and lumbar spine trauma from 2003 to 2009 in 2 spine trauma centers. Clinical and radiologic data were evaluated, classifying the trauma according to American Spinal Injury Association status, the Magerl/AO classification for fractures, and the TLICS score. RESULTS: The mean age was 37 years (range, 17-72). Thirty-five (71%) patients had a thoracolumbar fracture (T11-L2). A posterior approach was used in all the cases. American Spinal Injury Association status remained unchanged in 44 (4 had some improvement and 1 worsened). A total of 61.1% of the patients with a type A fracture were neurologically intact compared with 80% with complete neurologic deficit for type C fractures. The TLICS score range from 2 to 9 (average of 6.2). Forty-seven of 49 (96%) patients had a TLICS score greater than 4, suggesting surgical treatment. Seventy percentage of the patients with a TLICS score from 4 to 6 were neurologically intact compared with 87.5% of complete neurologic deficits in patients with TLICS 7 to 9. A statistic correlation was established between the neurologic status and AO type fracture (P = 0.0041) and the TLICS score (P < 0.0001). An association between the AO type fracture and the TLICS score was also found (P = 0.0088). CONCLUSION: The TLICS score treatment recommendation matched surgical treatment in 47 of 49 patients (96%). The TLICS was found to correlate to the AO classification. This suggests that the TLICS can be used to classify thoracolumbar trauma and can accurately predict surgical management.
机译:研究设计:回顾性研究。目的:评估神经系统状态,胸腰椎损伤分类系统(TLICS)评分和Magerl / AO分类系统之间的关系。背景技术概述:已经描述了用于胸和腰椎创伤的各种各样的分类方案,但是没有一个被广泛接受。 Vaccaro等人提出的最新系统已经开发出来,可以改善损伤分类并指导手术决策。方法:分析2003年至2009年在2个脊柱创伤中心接受手术治疗的胸椎和腰椎创伤的49例患者的情况。评估临床和放射学数据,根据美国脊髓损伤协会的状况,Magerl / AO骨折分类和TLICS评分对创伤进行分类。结果:平均年龄为37岁(范围17-72)。 35例(71%)患者患有胸腰椎骨折(T11-L2)。在所有情况下均采用后路入路。美国脊髓损伤协会的状态在44个中保持不变(4处有所改善,而1处恶化了)。总计61.1%的A型骨折患者在神经方面是完整的,而80%的C型骨折具有完全的神经功能缺损。 TLICS分数范围为2到9(平均6.2)。 49例患者中有47例(96%)的TLICS得分大于4,建议进行手术治疗。 TLICS评分为4至6的患者中,有70%的患者神经系统完整,而TLICS 7至9的患者中,完全神经功能缺损的比例为87.5%。在神经系统状态和AO型骨折之间建立了统计相关性(P = 0.0041) TLICS分数(P <0.0001)。还发现AO型骨折与TLICS评分之间存在关联(P = 0.0088)。结论TLICS评分治疗建议与49例患者中的47例(96%)相匹配。发现TLICS与AO分类相关。这表明TLICS可用于对胸腰椎创伤进行分类,并可准确预测手术管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号