...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Variation in eligibility criteria from studies of radiculopathy due to a herniated disc and of neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis: a structured literature review.
【24h】

Variation in eligibility criteria from studies of radiculopathy due to a herniated disc and of neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis: a structured literature review.

机译:椎间盘突出引起的神经根病和腰椎管狭窄引起的神经源性lau行的资格标准差异:结构性文献综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A structured literature review. SUMMARY OF THE BACKGROUND DATA: Widely recognized classification criteria for rheumatologic disorders have resulted in well-defined patient populations for clinical investigation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether similar criteria were needed for back pain disorders by examining variability in eligibility criteria in published studies. METHODS: Studies involving radiculopathy due to lumbar herniated disc (HD) and for neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were identified. Randomized controlled trials published between January 1, 2006 and October 1, 2008 in select peer reviewed journals were retrieved, their eligibility criteria were identified and categorized. RESULTS: Twelve eligible HD studies were identified. Thirteen unique categories of eligibility criteria were identified with a mean of 3.9 (+/-2.0) and a range from 0 to 8 categories per study. More categories were present for studies that included nonsurgical (5.6 +/- 2.5) treatment for studies with only surgical treatment (2.6 +/- 1.7) P = 0.04). Seven LSS studies met eligibility criteria, and 9 unique categories were identified. A mean of 5.0 (+/-2.2) categories with a range from 2 to 7 was used per study. CONCLUSION: Wide variation in the number and type of eligibility criteria from randomized clinical trials of well defined back pain syndromes was identified. These results support the need for developing and disseminating international classification criteria for these clinical conditions.
机译:研究设计:结构化文献综述。背景数据概述:风湿性疾病的广泛公认的分类标准已经为临床研究带来了明确的患者人群。目的:我们通过检查已发表研究的入选标准的变异性来确定是否需要类似的标准来治疗背痛。方法:确定了涉及因腰椎间盘突出症(HD)引起的神经根病和因腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)引起的神经源性lau行的研究。检索在2006年1月1日至2008年10月1日之间在某些同行评审期刊中发表的随机对照试验,确定其资格标准并进行分类。结果:确定了十二项合格的高清研究。确定了13个独特的资格标准类别,平均评分为3.9(+/- 2.0),每个研究范围为0至8个类别。对于仅包括外科治疗(2.6 +/- 1.7)的研究,包括非手术(5.6 +/- 2.5)治疗的研究存在更多类别(P = 0.04)。七项LSS研究符合资格标准,并且确定了9个独特的类别。每个研究使用平均5.0(+/- 2.2)个类别,范围从2到7。结论:从明确定义的背痛综合征的随机临床试验中,鉴定合格标准的数量和类型存在很大差异。这些结果支持针对这些临床状况制定和传播国际分类标准的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号