...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Biomechanical assessment of transoral plate fixation for atlantoaxial instability.
【24h】

Biomechanical assessment of transoral plate fixation for atlantoaxial instability.

机译:经口钢板固定寰枢椎不稳定性的生物力学评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: In an experimental study using human cadaver specimens the biomechanical data of anterior atlantoaxial plating according to Harms were evaluated. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate this method biomechanically. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: The optimum fixation method to achieve fusion at the atlantoaxial joint after odontoid resection is still a matter of discussion. Isolated posterior surgical procedures for treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial kyphosis with spinal cord compression are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Transoral atlantoaxial plate fixation has been designed by Harms as a fixation technique after odontoid resection. In a modification, this procedure has been combined with the posterior wire fusion according to Brooks. METHOD: Eight human cadaver craniocervical specimens were tested in flexion, extension, rotation, and bending with a nondestructive flexibility method using a nonconstrained testing apparatus. Five different groups were examined: 1) control group (intact); 2) unstable group (after dissection of the atlantoaxial ligaments and odontoidectomy), 3) Harms group (transoral atlantoaxial plate fixation) 4) Harms-Brooks group (transoral atlantoaxial plate fixation and dorsal atlantoaxial wire fixation); and 5) Magerl group (transarticular atlantoaxial screw fixation). In a second experimental series, failure loads of the Harms-Brooks and the Magerl fixation methods were determined. RESULTS: The angular displacement of the Harms-Brooks group and the Magerl group was less than in any other group. Stiffness values at 0-3.0 Nm loads in any direction were larger for the Harms-Brooks-and Magerl-fixated specimens than for the Harms, control, or unstable specimens. No statistically significant difference was observed between Harms-Brooks and Magerl reconstruction stiffness. Ultimate failure load in the Harms-Brooks group was higher than in the Magerl group. CONCLUSIONS: Experimentally, isolated anterior atlantoaxial plating was less stable than the combined reconstruction procedures. Transoral plate fixation according to Harms in combination with posterior wire fixation according to Brooks provided a failure load and stiffness equal to transarticular screw fixation according to Magerl.
机译:研究设计:在一项使用人体尸体标本的实验研究中,根据Harms对前寰枢椎板的生物力学数据进行了评估。目的:本研究的目的是通过生物力学评估该方法。总结和背景资料:在齿状突切除后在寰枢椎关节处实现融合的最佳固定方法仍在讨论中。单独的后路手术治疗伴有脊髓压迫的不可挽回的寰枢椎后凸畸形与高发病率和高死亡率相关。 Harms设计了经口寰枢椎板固定术作为齿状突切除术后的固定技术。在一种修改中,根据布鲁克斯的说法,该程序已与后金属丝融合术相结合。方法:使用无约束测试仪,采用无损柔性方法,对8具人体尸体颅颈标本进行了屈曲,伸展,旋转和弯曲测试。检查了五个不同的组:1)对照组(完整); 2)不稳定组(寰枢韧带解剖和齿状体切除术后),3)伤害组(经寰枢椎板固定)4)伤害-布鲁克斯组(经寰枢椎板固定和背寰枢线固定); 5)Magerl组(经关节寰枢椎螺钉固定)。在第二个实验系列中,确定了Harms-Brooks和Magerl固定方法的破坏载荷。结果:Harms-Brooks组和Magerl组的角位移小于其他任何组。 Harms-Brooks和Magerl固定样品在0-3.0 Nm载荷下在任何方向上的刚度值均大于Harms,对照或不稳定样品的刚度值。 Harms-Brooks和Magerl重建刚度之间没有观察到统计学上的显着差异。 Harms-Brooks组的最终破坏负荷高于Magerl组。结论:实验上,孤立的寰枢椎前路钢板不如联合重建程序稳定。根据Harms的经口钢板固定与根据Brooks的后线固定相结合,可提供与Magerl的经关节螺钉固定相同的破坏载荷和刚度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号