首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Crowding out or no crowding out? A Self-Determination Theory approach to health worker motivation in performance-based financing
【24h】

Crowding out or no crowding out? A Self-Determination Theory approach to health worker motivation in performance-based financing

机译:挤还是不挤?基于绩效的融资中卫生工作者动机的自决理论方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Performance-based financing (PBF) is a common health system reform approach in Low and middle income countries at, present. Although increasing evidence on the effectiveness of PBF and knowledge of principles of good design are available, research is still lacking in regards to other aspects. Among these are a yet limited understanding of the complex role of health worker motivation in PBF and of potential side effects, for instance on intrinsic motivation. Our article aims to support meaningful future research by advancing the theoretical discussion around health worker motivation and PBF. We argue that an in-depth understanding of the motivational mechanisms and consequences of PBF at health worker level are of high practical relevance and should be at the heart of the PBF research agenda, and that predominant unidimensional conceptualizations of health worker motivation and descriptive rather than explanatory research approaches are insufficient to fully understand whether, how, and why PBF schemes alter health workers' motivational structures, mindsets, affect, and behavior. We introduce and apply Self-Determination Theory to the context of PBF as a valuable theoretical framework for future empirical exploration. From this, we conclude that PBF interventions are unlikely to have a generally adverse effect on intrinsic motivation as feared by parts of the PBF community. Rather, we posit that PBF can have positive and negative effects on both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, to varying degrees depending on the specific design, implementation, and results of a particular intervention and on health workers' perceptions and evaluations of it. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:目前,基于绩效的筹资(PBF)是低收入和中等收入国家常见的卫生系统改革方法。尽管有越来越多的证据证明PBF的有效性和良好设计原理的知识,但在其他方面仍缺乏研究。其中对卫生工作者动机在PBF中的复杂作用以及潜在的副作用(例如对内在动机)的理解还很有限。本文旨在通过推进有关卫生工作者动机和PBF的理论讨论来支持有意义的未来研究。我们认为,深入了解PBF在卫生工作者层面的动机机制和后果具有高度的现实意义,应该是PBF研究议程的核心,并且卫生工作者动机和描述性而非描述性的主要一维概念化解释性研究方法不足以全面了解PBF计划是否,如何以及为何改变了卫生工作者的动机结构,思维方式,影响和行为。我们将自决理论引入PBF,并将其作为未来经验探索的有价值的理论框架。据此,我们得出结论,如PBF社区的某些部分所担心的那样,PBF干预不太可能对内在动机产生总体不利影响。相反,我们认为,PBF会对内在动机和外在动机产生积极和消极的影响,具体取决于特定干预措施的具体设计,实施和结果以及卫生工作者对其的看法和评估,其程度不同。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号