首页> 外文期刊>Science education >The effects of writing-to-learn activities on elementary students' conceptual understanding: Learning about force and motion through writing to older peers
【24h】

The effects of writing-to-learn activities on elementary students' conceptual understanding: Learning about force and motion through writing to older peers

机译:写作学习活动对小学生的概念理解的影响:通过向年龄较大的同龄人写信来学习力量和动作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This quasi-experimental and pre/posttest study was designed to examine whether fourth-grade students who engaged in collaboratively writing letters to 11th-grade students performed better on tests of conceptual understanding of a unit on force and motion than students who did not. The participants included 835 fourth-grade students and 416 11th-grade students from four elementary schools and one high school in the United States. Students in treatment groups were asked to write three letters for exchange at the beginning/during/completion of an 8-week teaching unit about force and motion. The structure of writing was based on three components of arguments: question, claim, and evidence. A comparison of the pre- and posttest results indicated that students who engaged in collaborative letter-writing tasks performed better than students who did not. The pre- and posttest results also showed that female, special, low socioeconomic status, and gifted students benefited the most from the collaborative letter-writing tasks. Through the letter-writing exchange activities, the fourth-grade students were supported and encouraged to learn difficult concepts by the 11th-grade students. The more the 11th graders asked the fourth graders for explanation and clarification of the concepts in the letters, the more the fourth-grade students learned. Two factors related to argumentative writing were identified as predictors of success on students' achievement tests: overall cohesiveness, with an emphasis on embedding multiple modal representations in the text and the strength of the relationship between claims and evidence. This study suggests that there is a pedagogical need to build support structures to help students understand the role of audience, the function of multiple modal representations, and the quality of evidence for supporting knowledge claims in argumentative writing, as this could lead to a better understanding of scientific concepts.
机译:这项准实验和前/后测研究旨在检验与11年级学生合作写信的四年级学生在对力和运动单元的概念理解测试中是否比不参加的学生表现更好。参与者包括来自美国四所小学和一所高中的835名四年级学生和416名11年级学生。治疗组的学生被要求在为期8周的关于力量和运动的教学单元的开始/过程中/完成时写三封信以进行交流。写作的结构基于论证的三个组成部分:问题,主张和证据。测验前和测验后结果的比较表明,从事协作性写作任务的学生的表现要好于没有进行协作性写作的学生。测验前和测验后的结果还表明,女性,特殊,社会经济地位低下和有天赋的学生从协作写信任务中受益最大。通过书信交流活动,四年级学生得到了十一年级学生的支持和鼓励,学习了困难的概念。十一年级学生要求四年级学生对字母中的概念进行解释和澄清的次数越多,四年级学生学习的内容就越多。与论据写作有关的两个因素被确定为学生成绩测验成功的预测因素:整体凝聚力,重点是在文本中嵌入多种模式表示形式以及主张与证据之间关系的强度。这项研究表明,在教学上需要建立支持结构,以帮助学生理解听众的角色,多种情态表征的功能以及在论证性写作中支持知识主张的证据质量,因为这可能会导致更好的理解科学概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号