...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >The necessity of evaluating child neck injury in frontal collision of school bus for transportation safety
【24h】

The necessity of evaluating child neck injury in frontal collision of school bus for transportation safety

机译:评估校车正面碰撞中儿童颈部伤害的交通安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The frequent school bus accidents and resulting injuries accelerated the formulation and revision of the school bus regulations. In the school bus regulations, the injury criteria and evaluation procedures of head, chest, and femur were included, however, neck injury evaluation has not been incorporated. Thus, the neck protection was often ignored and no relevant studies were found to specially focus on this topic. In this study, the child body region injuries, especially the neck under compartmentalization (without seatbelt), lap belt, and lap/shoulder belt restraint strategies in school bus frontal impact were particularly evaluated through a series of sled tests in laboratory environment. Results showed that most of the injury metrics of head, chest, and femur were below their threshold limits, but, on the contrary, most neck injury metrics did not meet the requirement of the regulations, which indicated that neck was one of the most easily injured regions in frontal impact. This study also pointed out that the lap/shoulder belt can provide good protections for all the body regions involved in this study, whereas traditional compartmentalization and only lap belt can protect head, chest, and femur well, but cannot effectively protect the neck, thus some countermeasures on redesigning the traditional seatback were proposed. According to the conclusions drawn in this study, neck injury evaluation are strongly recommended to incorporate into the regulations, meanwhile, lap/shoulder belt is also suggested to equip with the current school bus seats.
机译:频繁的校车事故和由此造成的伤害加速了校车法规的制定和修订。在校车规章中,包括了头部,胸部和股骨的损伤标准和评估程序,但是尚未纳入颈部损伤评估。因此,颈部保护经常被忽略,并且没有发现相关研究专门针对该主题。在这项研究中,通过在实验室环境中进行的一系列雪橇测试,特别评估了儿童身体部位的伤害,特别是在分隔(无安全带)时颈部,校车安全带以及校车正面碰撞中的腰/肩带约束策略。结果表明,大多数头部,胸部和股骨的损伤指标均低于阈值极限,但相反,大多数颈部损伤指标均未达到法规要求,表明颈部是最容易受伤的指标之一。受伤区域处于正面冲击。这项研究还指出,腰部/肩部安全带可以为参与本研究的所有身体部位提供良好的保护,而传统的分隔法和仅腰部安全带可以很好地保护头部,胸部和股骨,但不能有效地保护颈部,因此提出了重新设计传统座椅靠背的一些对策。根据这项研究得出的结论,强烈建议将颈部伤害评估纳入法规,同时建议也将腰/肩带安装在当前的校车座椅上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号