...
首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia research >Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic monotherapy vs. polypharmacy in schizophrenia: To switch or to combine? A nationwide study in Hungary
【24h】

Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic monotherapy vs. polypharmacy in schizophrenia: To switch or to combine? A nationwide study in Hungary

机译:抗精神病药物单一疗法与多药疗法在精神分裂症中的实际效果:转换还是合并?匈牙利的全国性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Leading guidelines recommend antipsychotic (AP) monotherapy for schizophrenia, nonetheless the combination of antipsychotics (polypharmacy) is common practice worldwide. We conducted a nationwide population-based study to investigate the comparative effectiveness of monotherapy versus polypharmacy in schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Methods: Data was collected from the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund's database and a non-interventional retrospective-prospective parallel arm study was designed with a monotherapy arm (MA, switch to a new antipsychotic after >. 60. days of monotherapy, N. = 5480) and a polypharmacy arm with two APs (PA, addition of a second antipsychotic after >. 60. days of monotherapy, N. = 7901). The analyses focused on therapy changers, who started a new monotherapy or added a new AP to the existing one. Polypharmacy combinations with more than two APs were not investigated. Fourteen APs were investigated representing the majority of marketed antipsychotics of Hungary in the period of 1/2007-12/2009. The principal endpoint was the time to all-cause treatment discontinuation during a one-year observation period. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were applied with propensity score adjustment. Results: The principal outcome measure time to all-cause discontinuation indicated superiority for monotherapy over polypharmacy for the majority of (oral and depot) second generation APs (SGAs). For first generation APs (FGAs), oral formulations did not show a difference between monotherapy and polypharmacy, while depot formulations exhibited polypharmacy advantage. For the four most frequently used oral SGAs, the median times to all-cause discontinuation for monotherapy and polypharmacy, respectively, were 192 and 100. days for aripiprazole; 222 and 86. days for olanzapine; 176 and 91. days for quetiapine; and 157 and 93. days for risperidone. For mortality and hospitalization, a significant overall advantage of polypharmacy was detected. Conclusions: Our study provides evidence for the superiority of monotherapy over polypharmacy for SGAs in terms of all-cause treatment discontinuation in schizophrenia. Polypharmacy, however, was associated with a lower likelihood of mortality and hospitalizations. The finding that MA is superior to PA for long-term sustained treatment whereas polypharmacy has advantage in mortality and psychiatric hospitalizations suggests that combination treatments may be more efficacious during exacerbation of psychotic symptoms.
机译:背景:领先的指南建议对精神分裂症使用抗精神病药(AP)单一疗法,尽管如此,抗精神病药(多药房)的组合在世界范围内很普遍。我们在全国范围内进行了一项基于人群的研究,以调查单药治疗与多药治疗精神分裂症和其他精神疾病的相对有效性。方法:从匈牙利国家健康保险基金会的数据库中收集数据,并采用单药治疗组(MA,单药治疗>。60天后改用新的抗精神病药,N。=)设计一项非干预性回顾性前瞻性平行研究。 5480)和具有两个AP(PA,在单药治疗> .. 60天后添加第二种抗精神病药,N = 7901)的综合药房。分析的重点是治疗改变者,他们开始了新的单一疗法或在现有疗法中添加了新的AP。没有研究具有两个以上AP的多药联用。在1 / 2007-12 / 2009期间,调查了代表匈牙利市场上大多数抗精神病药物的14个AP。主要终点是在一年的观察期内停止所有原因治疗的时间。应用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险模型进行倾向评分调整。结果:主要结局指标为全因停药时间表明大多数(口服和储库)第二代AP(SGA)单药治疗优于多药治疗。对于第一代AP(FGA),口服制剂在单药治疗和多药治疗之间没有差异,而长效制剂则显示出多药治疗的优势。对于四种最常使用的口服SGA,阿立哌唑的单药治疗和多药治疗所有原因停药的中位时间分别为192天和100天。奥氮平的天数为222和86。喹硫平为176天和91天。和利培酮的157和93.天。在死亡率和住院方面,发现了多药业的显着总体优势。结论:我们的研究为精神分裂症的全因治疗中止提供了单一疗法优于多药治疗SGA的证据。然而,多元药房与较低的死亡率和住院率相关。对于长期持续治疗,MA优于PA而多元药在死亡率和精神病住院方面具有优势,这一发现表明,在加重精神病症状期间,联合治疗可能更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号