...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >The incidence of intraocular foreign bodies and other intraocular findings in patients with corneal metal foreign bodies.
【24h】

The incidence of intraocular foreign bodies and other intraocular findings in patients with corneal metal foreign bodies.

机译:角膜金属异物患者眼内异物的发生率和其他眼内发现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To review the findings of dilated fundus examinations (DFEs) in patients with the diagnosis of corneal metal foreign body (CMFB) and to assess the likelihood of concomitant intraocular foreign body (IOFB) in this clinical setting. DESIGN: Retrospective, case review series. PARTICIPANTS: All 288 cases with a new diagnosis of CMFB that had a documented DFE in the emergency department at Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2008. In addition, all 9 separate cases of metal IOFB seen in the same time period were also reviewed. METHODS: The medical records of all patients were individually reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The DFE findings of each visit were analyzed in addition to mechanism of injury, visual acuity and anterior segment abnormalities. RESULTS: Of the 288 CMFB cases, all but 1 presented without corneal or conjunctival laceration. The etiologies of the injuries included low- and high-velocity impact. Best-corrected visual acuity ranged between 20/15 and 20/150. The anterior chamber (AC) reaction ranged from quiet to 4+ cells. None of the DFEs revealed an IOFB. Only 1 case had a posterior segment abnormality related to the injury-commotion retinae in the setting of an explosion. There were 14 cases with unrelated DFE findings. Among the separate 9 cases of metal IOFB reviewed, all had a history of high-velocity injury and evidence of corneal or conjunctival laceration. In 1 of the 9 cases, the IOFB was protruding from the cornea; in 2 cases, IOFBs were seen on DFE. Six cases were diagnosed by computed tomography. All documented AC examinations for this group of patients had significant findings such as 4+ cells, hyphema, or lens fragments. CONCLUSIONS: The finding of IOFB on a DFE for patients with a CMFB without clinical evidence of penetrating injury is very rare. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.
机译:目的:审查在诊断为角膜金属异物(CMFB)的患者中眼底扩张检查(DFEs)的发现,并评估在这种临床情况下伴随眼内异物(IOFB)的可能性。设计:回顾性,案例审查系列。参与者:从2008年1月1日至2008年12月31日,在马萨诸塞州眼耳病房急诊室的所有288例新诊断为CMFB的病例都记录了DFE。此外,同期还进行了审查。方法:对所有患者的病历进行单独检查。主要观察指标:除了损伤机制,视敏度和前节异常外,还分析了每次就诊的DFE结果。结果:在288例CMFB病例中,除1例外均无角膜或结膜撕裂。受伤的病因包括低速和高速撞击。最佳矫正视力在20/15到20/150之间。前房(AC)反应范围从安静到4+细胞。没有DFE透露IOFB。在爆炸的情况下,只有1例具有与损伤运动性视网膜相关的后段异常。有14例DFE检查结果无关。在分别回顾的9例金属IOFB中,所有病例均具有高速损伤史,并有角膜或结膜撕裂的证据。在9例病例中,有1例IOFB从角膜突出。在2例中,在DFE上看到了IOFB。通过计算机断层扫描诊断出六例。对于该组患者,所有已记录的AC检查均具有明显的发现,例如4+细胞,前房积血或晶状体碎片。结论:对于没有穿透性损伤临床证据的CMFB患者,在DFE上发现IOFB的情况非常罕见。财务披露:作者对本文讨论的任何材料均没有所有权或商业利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号