...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Effect of technique on intraocular pressure after combined cataract and glaucoma surgery: An evidence-based review.
【24h】

Effect of technique on intraocular pressure after combined cataract and glaucoma surgery: An evidence-based review.

机译:该技术对白内障和青光眼联合手术后眼内压的影响:循证审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

TOPIC: To analyze the literature pertaining to the techniques used in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery, including the technique of cataract extraction, the timing of the surgery (staged procedure versus combined procedure), the anatomic location of the operation, and the use of antifibrosis agents. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cataract and glaucoma are both common conditions and are often present in the same patient. There is no agreement concerning the optimal surgical management of these disorders when they coexist. METHODS/LITERATURE REVIEWED: Electronic searches of English language articles published since 1964 were conducted in Pub MED and CENTRAL, the Cochrane Collaboration's database. These were augmented by a hand search of six ophthalmology journals and the reference lists of a sample of studies included in the literature review. Evidence grades (A, strong; B, moderate; C, weak; I, insufficient) were assigned to the evidence that involved a direct comparison of alternative techniques. RESULTS: The preponderance of evidence from the literature suggests a small (2-4 mmHg) benefit from the use of mitomycin-C (MMC), but not 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery (evidence grade B). Two-site surgery provides slightly lower (1-3 mmHg) intraocular pressure (IOP) than one-site surgery (evidence grade C), and IOP is lowered more (1-3 mmHg) by phacoemulsification than by nuclear expression in combined procedures (evidence grade C). There is insufficient evidence to conclude either that staged or combined procedures give better results or that alternative glaucoma procedures are superior to trabeculectomy in combined procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In the literature on surgical techniques and adjuvants used in the management of coexisting cataract and glaucoma, the strongest evidence of efficacy exists for using MMC, separating the incisions for cataract and glaucoma surgery, and removing the nucleus by phacoemulsification.
机译:主题:分析与白内障和青光眼联合手术技术有关的文献,包括白内障摘除技术,手术时间(分期手术与联合手术),手术的解剖位置以及抗纤维化的使用代理商。临床相关性:白内障和青光眼都是常见病,经常出现在同一患者中。当这些疾病共存时,关于最佳手术治疗尚无共识。方法/文献综述:自1964年以来发表的英语文章的电子搜索是在Cochrane合作数据库Pub MED和CENTRAL中进行的。通过手动搜索六种眼科期刊和文献综述中所包含研究样本的参考文献清单,可以增强这些内容。证据等级(A,强; B,中; C,弱; I,不足)被分配给涉及替代技术直接比较的证据。结果:大量文献证据表明,在白内障和青光眼联合手术中使用丝裂霉素-C(MMC)而不是5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)可获得少量(2-4 mmHg)的收益(证据级别B)。两部位手术提供的眼内压(IOP)比一部位手术(证据为C级)稍低(1-3 mmHg),并且在联合手术中,超声乳化术比通过核表达可降低IOP(1-3 mmHg)(1-3mmHg)(证据等级C)。没有足够的证据得出结论,分阶段或联合手术可提供更好的结果,或者在联合手术中青光眼替代手术优于小梁切除术。结论:在有关治疗白内障和青光眼并存的手术技术和佐剂的文献中,最有力的证据表明使用MMC,分离白内障和青光眼手术的切口并通过超声乳化术去除核。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号