首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers >Clinical evaluation of posterior capsule opacification in eyes with different small-incision intraocular lenses.
【24h】

Clinical evaluation of posterior capsule opacification in eyes with different small-incision intraocular lenses.

机译:不同小切口人工晶状体眼后囊混浊的临床评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To present a new method to quantify posterior capsular opacity with an anterior eye segment image analyzer (EAS 1000, NIDEK). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was comprised of patients who underwent phacoemulsification intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Three types of IOLS, acrylic, silicone, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were allocated to 30 eyes and clinically evaluated. Patients were observed for 3 years postoperatively using an anterior eye segment image analyzer (EAS1000). Opacity was determined by calculating the area of opacity from a retroillumination image. In the retroillumination mode of analysis, the measurement was limited to a 4-mm-diameter region of the pupillary zone to eliminate the influence of anterior capsular opacity. For color map analysis, the threshold level was expressed as the color tone of 0-255 CCT (computer compatible tape). The glare disability was measured to evaluate the three types of IOLs. RESULTS: The color map analysis revealed a time-related increase in the opacity level of patients receiving the PMMA IOL implant. Three years after surgery, the levels were significantly higher in the PMMA group (P < 0.01) compared to the acryl and silicone groups: acryl (17.5 +/- 3.8), silicone (18.0 +/- 6.2%), and PMMA 36.5 +/- 32.9%. CONCLUSION: Quantitative evaluation using an anterior eye segment image analyzer is effective for observing the degree of posterior capsule opacification. The color map analysis using an anterior eye segment image correlated with the visual function revealed that the time-related increase in the opacity level was significant during the third year in patients receiving PMMA IOL implantation.
机译:背景与目的:提出一种使用前眼节图像分析仪(EAS 1000,NIDEK)量化后囊不透明度的新方法。患者与方法:本研究包括接受超声乳化人工晶状体(IOL)植入术的患者。将三种类型的IOLS,丙烯酸,硅树脂和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)分配给30只眼睛,并进行临床评估。术后使用眼前节图像分析仪(EAS1000)观察患者3年。通过从反照图像计算不透明度的面积来确定不透明度。在后照明分析模式中,测量仅限于瞳孔区直径4毫米的区域,以消除前囊不透明性的影响。对于色图分析,阈值级别表示为0-255 CCT(计算机兼容的磁带)的色调。测量眩光残疾以评估三种类型的IOL。结果:颜色图分析显示,接受PMMA IOL植入物的患者的不透明度随时间增加。手术三年后,与丙烯酸和有机硅组相比,PMMA组的水平显着更高(P <0.01):丙烯酸(17.5 +/- 3.8),有机硅(18.0 +/- 6.2%)和PMMA 36.5 + -32.9%。结论:使用前眼节图像分析仪进行定量评估可有效观察后囊混浊程度。使用与视觉功能相关的前眼节图像进行的颜色图分析显示,接受PMMA IOL植入的患者在第三年内与时间相关的不透明性水平显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号