...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Agriculture & Horticulture >On-farm produced microbial soil inoculant effects on bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) production
【24h】

On-farm produced microbial soil inoculant effects on bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) production

机译:农场生产的微生物土壤接种剂对面包小麦(Triticum aestivum)产量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of microbial soil inoculants in agriculture is of increasing interest among growers and scientists. This study aimed to determine the effects of a commercially available arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) inoculant, an on-farm produced AMF inoculant, and an on-farm produced indigenous microbial inoculant on bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) AMF colonization, biomass accumulation, nutrient uptake and recovery, and grain yield and protein in a containerized greenhouse experiment and two years of field trials conducted in Maine, USA. The inoculants were compared with respective controls (sterilized inoculants) and the levels of N, P and K were equalized across treatments. Both AMF inoculants enhanced AMF colonization in a greenhouse potting mix containing unsterilized field soil, but only the on-farm produced AMF increased aboveground biomass and phosphorus (P) uptake and recovery. No differences were observed among inoculants and their relative controls in the field. However, the indigenous microbial inoculant (IMO+) increased wheat aboveground biomass, nutrient uptake, nutrient recovery and grain yield when compared with the mycorrhizal inoculants, but no increases were observed when contrasted against its control (IMO-). Wheat growth enhancements from IMO were likely due to nutrient supply from the compost-based material in which it was produced. Results demonstrate that a mycorrhizal inoculant produced on-farm can increase wheat AMF colonization, aboveground biomass, and P uptake and recovery in a containerized setting. Otherwise differences between inoculants and their relative controls were limited, perhaps due to competition from the native soil microbial community, thus inoculation of field plots cannot be recommended for wheat.
机译:种植者和科学家对在农业中使用微生物土壤孕育剂的兴趣日益增加。这项研究旨在确定市售的丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)接种剂,农场生产的AMF接种剂和农场生产的原生微生物接种剂对面包小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)的影响AMF定殖,生物量积累在美国缅因州进行的集装箱温室试验和两年的田间试验中,测定了养分的吸收和回收率,以及谷物的产量和蛋白质。将接种物与相应的对照(灭菌接种物)进行比较,并在各处理之间使N,P和K的水平相等。两种AMF孕育剂均增强了含有未灭菌田间土壤的温室盆栽混合物中的AMF定植,但只有农场生产的AMF才增加了地上生物量和磷(P)的吸收和回收。接种剂及其相关对照在野外未见差异。但是,与菌根接种剂相比,本地微生物接种剂(IMO +)增加了小麦地上生物量,养分吸收,养分回收和谷物产量,但与对照(IMO-)相比没有观察到增加。 IMO促进小麦生长的原因可能是来自其生产的基于堆肥的材料提供的养分。结果表明在农场生产的菌根接种物可以增加小麦AMF的定殖,地上生物量以及在集装箱化环境中对P的吸收和恢复。否则,孕育剂及其相关对照之间的差异将受到限制,这可能是由于来自本地土壤微生物群落的竞争所致,因此,不建议在小麦田间接种田间地块。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号