...
首页> 外文期刊>Oncology >Value Judgments in Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer: A Paradox in Healthcare Reform
【24h】

Value Judgments in Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer: A Paradox in Healthcare Reform

机译:前列腺癌诊断成像的价值判断:医疗改革的悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As federal agencies work to reduce the cost of healthcare delivery in this country, the high cost of cancer therapy-which is delivered primarily to Medicare recipients-is being especially targeted. Beyond safety and efficacy, the value of medical procedures will increasingly need to be justified to payors, who for more than 60% of Americans is now the federal government. One of six chief obstacles to affordable, high-quality healthcare that have been identified by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) is the "overuse and misuse of medical resources and care that do not align with clinical practice guidelines." The IOM has indicated that many screening interventions, especially imaging technologies, are often overused or adopted before clinical benefits have been proven. In the same report that identified obstacles to affordable high-quality care, the IOM suggested four criteria for assessing value in medical care: Increased survival. Reduced side effects. Improved quality of life. Reduced costs. Consistent with the goals of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), the IOM recommended that any treatment or procedure, in order to be deemed "of value," should demonstrate at least one of these four benefits. The 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening applied the IOM approach to assessing value in healthcare. The potential harms from screening evaluations and from treatment of indolent disease were thought by the USPSTF to far outweigh any potential benefit from earlier detection, and watchful waiting was determined to be an acceptable alternative to radical prostatectomy in men 65 years of age and older. Previously, the strategy in cancer screening was to identify patients with cancer and determine the most appropriate and effective treatment for each. Now the emphasis is on avoiding the potential harms associated with diagnostic procedures, such as biopsies, and treatment for asymptomatic disease, especially in patients with multiple comorbidities.
机译:随着联邦机构努力降低该国的医疗保健成本,特别针对癌症的高昂费用(主要交付给Medicare接受者)。除了安全性和有效性,医疗程序的价值将越来越需要付款人证明其合理性,对于60%以上的美国人来说,他们现在是联邦政府。医学研究所(IOM)认为,负担得起的高质量医疗保健的六个主要障碍之一是“医疗资源和护理的过度使用和滥用,不符合临床实践指南。” IOM指出,许多筛查干预措施,尤其是成像技术,在证明临床益处​​之前经常被过度使用或采用。在同一份报告中指出了负担得起的高质量医疗服务的障碍,IOM提出了四个评估医疗服务价值的标准:提高生存率。减少副作用。改善生活质量。降低成本。根据《患者保护和负担得起的护理法》(PPACA)的目标,IOM建议任何治疗或程序(被认为具有“价值”)应至少显示出这四种益处中的一种。 2012年美国预防服务工作队(USPSTF)针对前列腺特异性抗原筛查的建议将IOM方法应用于评估医疗保健价值。 USPSTF认为,筛查评估和惰性疾病治疗所带来的潜在危害远远超过了早期发现所带来的任何潜在收益,并且对于65岁以上的男性,观察性等待已被认为是前列腺癌根治术的可接受替代方案。以前,癌症筛查的策略是确定患有癌症的患者,并为每个患者确定最合适和有效的治疗方法。现在的重点是避免与诊断程序(例如活检)和无症状疾病的治疗相关的潜在危害,尤其是在患有多种合并症的患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号