首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Voluntary Motion to Dismiss
【24h】

Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Voluntary Motion to Dismiss

机译:法院管辖权,程序和审查:驳回的自愿动议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The State of Wyoming brings an action against EOG Resources, Inc. in Laramie County District Court under the Wyoming Royalty Payment Act (WRPA), Wyo. Stat. Ann § 30-5-301, et seq., relating to revenues allegedly due on oil and gas wells located in Laramie County and other counties. EOG moves to dismiss, challenging the Laramie County district court's jurisdiction to hear the matter. Before the issue of jurisdiction under WRPA is decided by the Wyoming Supreme Court in another case, the State files suit under WRPA in district court in three other counties where the wells are located, and moves for a voluntary dismissal of the action filed in Laramie County.' The Laramie County District Court grants the State's motion for voluntary dismissal. EOG appeals, claiming that the trial court's grant of the State's motion for voluntary dismissal without an initial finding that it has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to WRPA is contrary to law, and that its grant of the State's motion without imposing any curative terms and conditions is an abuse of discretion. Held: affirmed. The Wyoming Supreme Court finds that, given the facts and the nature of the ongoing litigation between the parties on the same subject matter, the trial court's dismissal of the Laramie County action under Wyo. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) is proper. The trial court made no operative ruling other man to dismiss the action. While the trial court has the discretion to require plaintiff to compensate EOG for the expense it has been put through, it did not act in an arbitrary and capricious manner in not awarding EOG its attorneys' fees and costs as a condition for dismissal of the Laramie County action.
机译:怀俄明州根据怀俄明州怀俄明州版税支付法(WRPA)在拉勒米县地方法院对EOG Resources,Inc.提起诉讼。 Ann§30-5-301等,与据称在Laramie县和其他县的油气井应得的收入有关。 EOG撤职,对Laramie县地方法院的管辖权提出异议。在怀俄明州最高法院在另一起案件中裁定WRPA管辖权问题之前,纽约州根据WRPA在其他三口井所在县向地方法院提起诉讼,并提出自愿撤消在Laramie县提起的诉讼的请求。 。”拉勒米县地方法院批准了该州自愿解雇的动议。 EOG上诉,声称审判法院在没有初步认定其根据WRPA拥有客体管辖权的情况下批准了州的自愿解雇动议是违反法律的,并且其在不施加任何治疗性条款和条件的情况下批准州的动议是滥用酌处权。举行:肯定。怀俄明州最高法院裁定,鉴于当事双方之间就同一主题进行的诉讼的事实和性质,初审法院驳回了怀俄明州R. Civ案下的拉勒米县诉讼。 P. 41(a)(2)是正确的。初审法院没有任何执行人裁定其他人驳回诉讼。初审法院有权要求原告赔偿EOG的费用,但它没有以任意和反复无常的方式采取行动,没有将EOG的律师费和费用判给EOG以解散Laramie。县行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号