...
首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Severance Tax: Barrel-Back Transactions
【24h】

Severance Tax: Barrel-Back Transactions

机译:遣散费:桶后交易

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Various oil producers enter into "barrel-back" transactions with Sunoco whereby the producers sell their oil to Sunoco at the well, Sunoco transports the oil to various market centers where it sells the oil back to the producers, who then turn around and sell to third parties at prices higher than the wellhead price. Sunoco pays the severance tax on behalf of the producers based on the wellhead price. The severance tax statute states that the severance tax is based on the "total value of the mineral'oil, gas, or casinghead gas, at the time and place of production . . ." 68 O.S.2001 § 1010(B)(5). The Tax Commission believes that the "barrel-back" transactions are a scheme entered into by the producers and facilitated by Sunoco to sell the oil off of the lease at a higher price which utilizing the lower wellhead price for severance tax calculation purposes. The tax statute imposes upon the first purchaser of the oil the duty to pay the severance tax. Id., § 1010(B)(5). Sunoco argues that after its purchase at the wellehead, the producer loses its status as a producer under the severance tax statute and its subsequent purchase at the market center is not covered by the statute. The Tax Commission argues that the oil is not sold at the wellhead and therefore the producer retains responsibility for paying the severance tax based on the "total value" of the minerals. The trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals find in favor of Sunoco. Held: affirmed. The Supreme Court treats the issue as involving the interpretation of the term "retained" as used in the severance tax statute. Oklahoma applies a number of canons of statutory construction including using the plain meaning canon. The term "retained" means keeping in one's possession which is clearly not the case under the "barrel-back" transaction. While noting that the transaction is a means to evade paying severance taxes based on a higher downstream value, the Commission does not have the authority to interpret the severance tax statute in a manner that eliminates the "loophole." Such loophole closing falls within the province of the Oklahoma Legislature.
机译:各种石油生产商与Sunoco进行“桶装式”交易,这些生产商将其石油卖给Sunoco的油井,Sunoco将石油运输到各个市场中心,在那里将石油卖回给生产商,然后由后者转身出售给第三方的价格高于井口价格。 Sunoco代表生产商根据井口价格支付遣散费。遣散税法规规定,遣散税是基于“矿物的油,气或套管头气在生产的时间和地点的总价值……”。 68 O.S. 2001§1010(B)(5)。税务委员会认为,“桶装”交易是生产商订立的一项计划,并由Sunoco推动,以较高的价格从租赁中出售石油,并利用较低的井口价格进行遣散税计算。税收法规规定石油的第一购买者有义务支付遣散费。同上,第1010(B)(5)条。 Sunoco辩称,根据遣散税法,生产者在井口购买产品后将失去其生产者资格,该法规未涵盖其在市场中心的后续购买。税务委员会争辩说,不是在井口出售石油,因此,生产商保留根据矿物的“总价值”支付遣散费的责任。初审法院和民事上诉法院认为Sunoco是有利的。举行:肯定。最高法院将这一问题视为涉及遣散税法中所用的“保留”一词的解释。俄克拉荷马州采用了许多法定构造标准,包括使用简单的意思标准。术语“保留”是指保留财产,而“桶装”交易显然不是这种情况。委员会注意到该交易是一种基于较高下游价值来逃避支付遣散费的手段,但委员会无权以消除“漏洞”的方式解释遣散税法规。这种漏洞的关闭属于俄克拉荷马州立法机关的管辖范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号