首页> 外文期刊>Oikos: A Journal of Ecology >The biodiversity-ecosystem service relationship in urban areas: a quantitative review
【24h】

The biodiversity-ecosystem service relationship in urban areas: a quantitative review

机译:城市地区生物多样性-生态系统服务关系:定量审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

By 2050, up to 75% of people globally will live in cities. Despite the potential ramifications of this urbanization for ecosystem services (ES), and the importance of locally produced ES for the health and wellbeing of urban residents, syntheses addressing the underlying ecology of ES provision rarely include urban areas. Here, I conduct a quantitative review of urban ES studies in the ecological literature, synthesizing trends across the discipline. I also quantify the extent to which this work considers the organisms and ecosystem components responsible for ES provision using two approaches: assessment of biodiversity-ES relationships, and an adaptation of the service provider concept. The majority of urban ES studies were conducted in western, developed countries, and typically assessed a single service in a single city - largely ignoring ES synergies and tradeoffs, and cross-city comparisons. While several different ES are studied in urban ecosystems, the field is dominated by weather and climate-related regulating services, with assessments of cultural services particularly lacking. Most studies described a habitat type as the service provider; however, studies that considered the biodiversity-ES relationship were more likely to identify a specific functional group, community, or population as the key provider of an ES. The biodiversity-ES relationship itself was most frequently characterized as dependent on the composition of species, functional traits, or structures, rather than correlated with the magnitude of any specific biodiversity metric. While the study of ES in urban ecosystems is increasing, there exists considerable room for further research. Future studies would benefit by expanding the number and categories of ES assessed within and across cities, as well as broadening the geographical scope of urban ES research. Biodiversity-ES assessments in urban ecosystems would also benefit from an expansion of the biodiversity types considered, particularly regarding non-species based approaches, and consideration of non-native and invasive species.
机译:到2050年,全球多达75%的人口将生活在城市中。尽管这种城市化对生态系统服务(ES)的潜在影响,以及本地生产的ES对于城市居民的健康和福祉的重要性,但解决ES提供的基本生态问题的综合方法很少包括城市地区。在这里,我对生态文学中的城市环境与社会研究进行了定量回顾,综合了整个学科的趋势。我还使用两种方法量化了这项工作考虑负责提供ES的生物和生态系统组成部分的程度:评估生物多样性与ES的关系以及对服务提供商概念的适应。大多数城市ES研究是在西方发达国家进行的,通常评估了单个城市中的一项服务-很大程度上忽略了ES的协同作用和权衡取舍以及跨城市的比较。虽然在城市生态系统中研究了几种不同的生态系统,但该领域主要是与天气和气候有关的调节服务,尤其是缺乏对文化服务的评估。大多数研究将栖息地类型描述为服务提供者。但是,考虑到生物多样性与生态系统关系的研究更有可能确定特定的功能群体,社区或人口作为生态系统的主要提供者。生物多样性与生态系统之间的关系本身最经常被表征为取决于物种的组成,功能性状或结构,而不是与任何特定生物多样性指标的大小相关。在城市生态系统中对ES的研究不断增加的同时,还有相当大的研究空间。未来的研究将受益于扩大在城市内部和城市之间评估的环境与社会的数量和类别,以及扩大城市环境与社会研究的地理范围。城市生态系统中的生物多样性-ES评估也将受益于所考虑的生物多样性类型的扩展,特别是关于基于非物种的方法以及对非本地和入侵物种的考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号