【24h】

Rethinking the Bioethics of Pregnancy Time for a New Perspective?

机译:重新思考妊娠时间的生命伦理学?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Within the realm of bioethics, the construction of pregnancy classically has focused on principle-based ethics, essentially separating maternal and fetal interests. Respect for maternal autonomy becomes distinct from an obligation of fetal beneficence, placing practitioners in complicated ethical situations when the goals of pregnant women may be at odds with the best health interests of the fetus as defined by both professional groups and society in general. As a result, clinical care is framed by an ethical "maternal-fetal conflict," with important downstream legal and policy consequences for the well-being of pregnant women. Developments in the social sciences highlight the value of attending to the biosocial realm that a pregnant woman inhabits rather than relating to her and to her fetus as discrete entities. By understanding the needs, concerns, and context within which a woman lives, clinicians can practice an ethics of accompaniment. With a focus on an ethics of accompaniment, assumptions about the maternal moral responsibility to fetal health made by practitioners and society in general can directly affect not only clinical care, but also the way policy surrounding reproductive health is constructed and implemented.
机译:在生物伦理学领域内,怀孕的构建从经典上讲是基于原则的伦理学,基本上将母体和胎儿的利益分开了。尊重母亲的自主权与胎儿的福利义务不同,当孕妇的目标可能与专业团体和整个社会所定义的胎儿的最佳健康利益背道而驰时,使从业者处于复杂的道德境地。结果,临床护理由道德上的“母婴冲突”构架,对孕妇的健康产生了重要的下游法律和政策后果。社会科学的发展突显了关注孕妇所居住的生物社会领域的价值,而不是将其和作为离散实体的胎儿联系起来。通过了解女性生活的需要,关注和背景,临床医生可以练习伴奏的道德规范。着重于陪伴伦理,从业者和整个社会对产妇对胎儿健康的道德责任的假设不仅会直接影响临床护理,而且会直接影响围绕生殖健康的政策的制定和实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号