...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Higher hysterectomy risk for sterilized than nonsterilized women: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. The U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.
【24h】

Higher hysterectomy risk for sterilized than nonsterilized women: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. The U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.

机译:与未灭菌的女性相比,未灭菌女性的子宫切除术风险更高:《美国无菌合作研究》的调查结果。美国消毒灭菌协作小组工作组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of hysterectomy among previously sterilized women and women whose husbands had undergone vasectomy, and to evaluate whether this risk differed by age at surgical procedure or by method of tubal occlusion. METHODS: Our study population comprised 7718 women enrolled in a prospective, multicenter cohort study between 1978 and 1986. After stratifying by the woman's age at surgical procedure, we used the life-table approach and adjusted hazards ratios to examine whether the relative risk of hysterectomy during the 5 years after enrollment differed between the 7174 women who had been sterilized and the 544 women whose husbands had undergone vasectomy. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative probability of hysterectomy was 8% among the previously sterilized women and 2% among the women whose husbands had undergone vasectomy. Among women 34 years of age and younger at enrollment, sterilized women were 4.4 times as likely to have a hysterectomy as women whose husbands had undergone vasectomy (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9, 10.0). Findings were similar for women 35 years of age and older (rate ratio = 4.6; 95% CI 1.4, 14.5). Each of the six most commonly used methods of tubal occlusion was associated with an increased risk of hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Women undergoing tubal sterilization were more likely than women whose husbands underwent vasectomy to undergo hysterectomy within 5 years after sterilization, regardless of age at sterilization. An increased risk of hysterectomy was observed for each method of tubal occlusion.
机译:目的:比较先前绝育妇女和丈夫进行输精管结扎术的妇女进行子宫切除的风险,并评估该风险是否因手术年龄或输卵管阻塞方法而异。方法:我们的研究人群包括1978年至1986年之间参加前瞻性,多中心队列研究的7718名女性。在按手术年龄对女性进行分层后,我们使用了生命表方法并调整了危险比,以检查子宫切除术的相对风险在入组后的5年中,有7174名接受过绝育的妇女和544名接受过输精管结扎术的丈夫的妇女有所不同。结果:先前接受过绝育手术的妇女的5年子宫切除术的累积概率为8%,而丈夫接受输精管切除术的妇女则为2%。在入组年龄在34岁以下的女性中,绝育女性进行子宫切除术的可能性是丈夫进行输精管切除术的女性的4.4倍(95%置信区间[CI] 1.9,10.0)。 35岁及以上女性的研究结果相似(比率= 4.6; 95%CI 1.4,14.5)。六种最常用的输卵管阻塞方法均与子宫切除术的风险增加相关。结论:进行输卵管绝育术的妇女比其丈夫在绝育后5年内接受输精管切除术的妇女更有可能接受子宫切除术,而不论其年龄在绝育后。对于每种输卵管阻塞方法,观察到子宫切除的风险增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号