首页> 外文期刊>Occupational and environmental medicine >Physical and psychosocial ergonomic risk factors for low back pain in automobile manufacturing workers.
【24h】

Physical and psychosocial ergonomic risk factors for low back pain in automobile manufacturing workers.

机译:汽车制造工人腰背痛的身体和社会心理人体工程学危险因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between ergonomic physical and psychosocial exposures and the risk of prevalent and incident low back pain (LBP) in a longitudinal cohort of automobile manufacturing workers. METHODS: Ergonomic exposure intensity and LBP presence were determined through questionnaires at baseline (n=1181) and to workers in the same job 1 year later (n=505). Models were constructed using log-binomial regression with special attention to interactions between ergonomic exposures. RESULTS: Awkward back posture (prevalence ratio (PR) 1.12, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.17), hand force (PR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.10), physical effort (PR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.16) and whole body vibration (PR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08) were each associated cross-sectionally with LBP. Awkward back posture (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.31) and hand force (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.22) also predicted incident LBP, although estimates were statistically less precise. Neither job control, psychological demands, nor job strain was independently related to risk of incident LBP. Among participants reporting high physical ergonomic exposures and moderate to high job control, increasing job demands was associated with a reduced LBP risk (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.00). Among participants reporting high physical exposures and low job control, psychological demands was associated with an increased LBP risk (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.66). CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial workplace interventions for LBP should prioritise jobs in which there are high physical ergonomic exposures. Future studies of LBP should examine the interactions between physical ergonomic risk factors.
机译:目的:研究人机工程学方面的身体和心理社会暴露与汽车制造工人纵向队列中普遍发生的腰背痛和突发性腰痛的风险之间的关系。方法:通过基线时的问卷调查(n = 1181)以及一年后从事同一工作的工人(n = 505)确定人体工程学暴露强度和LBP的存在。使用对数二项式回归构建模型,并特别注意人体工程学暴露之间的相互作用。结果:尴尬的背部姿势(患病率(PR)1.12,95%CI 1.07至1.17),手力(PR 1.06,95%CI 1.02至1.10),体力(PR 1.10,95%CI 1.04至1.16)和整体身体振动(PR 1.04,95%CI 1.01至1.08)的横截面均与LBP相关。尴尬的背部姿势(RR 1.13,95%CI 0.98至1.31)和手部力量(RR 1.07,95%CI 0.93至1.22)也预测了LBP,尽管统计上的准确性较差。工作控制,心理需求或工作压力都与发生LBP的风险无关。在参与者中,身体工效学方面的暴露水平较高,并且中度至高度的工作控制较高,而工作需求增加与LBP风险降低相关(RR 0.72,95%CI 0.52至1.00)。在参与者中,身体暴露过多和工作控制程度低,心理需求与LBP风险增加相关(RR 1.30,95%CI 1.02至1.66)。结论:LBP的社会心理工作场所干预措施应优先考虑人体工学方面较高的工作。 LBP的未来研究应检查人体工程学危险因素之间的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号