首页> 外文期刊>Library and Information Science >Concept of facet of ranganathan and vickery from the viewpoint of structure-expression style theory
【24h】

Concept of facet of ranganathan and vickery from the viewpoint of structure-expression style theory

机译:从结构表达风格理论的角度看ranganathan和wicker的构面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: This study discusses three research questions from the viewpoint of structure-expression style: (1) what is the concept of "facet" proposed by Ranganathan, (2) how did Ranganathan and Vickery consider the relationship between analytic-synthetic classification and faceted classification, and (3) how did Ranganathan and Vickery consider the relationship between facet and fundamental category (or common facet). Method: In a previous paper, the present author investigated each work of Ranganathan in chronological order. This paper reanalyzes the results obtained in the previous paper based on the theory of structure-expression style. This theory distinguishes two kinds of categorization methods of classification systems: one is by structure, either hierarchical or multi-dimensional, and the other is by expression style, either enumerative or synthetic. The writings of Vickery are also investigated and compared with those of Ranganathan based on the same theory. Results: The concept of Ranganathan's facet is "totality of the classes." Although this concept itself is simple, a current misunderstanding is that facet may be used in combination with "notation consisting of plural independent elements," because both of these are adopted in the Colon Classification. Notation consisting of plural independent elements has also been confused with "composition of class numbers." These three concepts should be distinguished definitively based on the theory of structure-expression style. These confusions influenced the later works of Ranganathan as well as the entire body of work of Vickery.
机译:目的:本研究从结构表达方式的角度讨论了三个研究问题:(1)Ranganathan提出的“构面”概念是什么,(2)Ranganathan和Vickery如何考虑分析综合分类与构面之间的关系分类;(3)Ranganathan和Vickery如何考虑构面与基本类别(或共同构面)之间的关系。方法:在先前的论文中,作者按时间顺序研究了Ranganathan的每项工作。本文基于结构表达风格的理论,重新分析了先前的研究成果。该理论区分了分类系统的两种分类方法:一种是通过结构(层次结构或多维)进行的,另一种是通过表达方式(枚举或综合的)进行的。基于相同的理论,也对维格里的著作进行了研究,并将其与兰格纳坦(Ranganathan)的著作进行了比较。结果:Ranganathan方面的概念是“阶级总数”。尽管该概念本身很简单,但是当前的误解是,可将构面与“由多个独立元素组成的符号”结合使用,因为在冒号分类中都采用了这两种形式。由多个独立元素组成的符号也与“类编号的组成”相混淆。这三个概念应基于结构表达风格的理论进行明确区分。这些困惑影响了Ranganathan的后期作品以及Vickery的整个作品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号