...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >The effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction: animation versus dispatcher through a cellular phone.
【24h】

The effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction: animation versus dispatcher through a cellular phone.

机译:心肺复苏教学的有效性:通过手机进行动画对调度员的对比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: We developed a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instruction programme using motion capture animation integrated into cellular phones. We compared the effectiveness of animation-assisted CPR instruction with dispatcher-assisted instruction in participants with no previous CPR training. METHODS: This study was a single blind cluster randomized trial. Participants were allocated to either animation-assisted CPR (AA-CPR; 8 clusters, 44 participants) group or dispatcher-assisted CPR (DA-CPR; 8 clusters, 41 participants). The overall performance and time of each step of CPR cycle were recorded on a checklist by 3 assessors. The objective performances were evaluated using the Resusci Anne SkillReporter Manikin. Differences between the groups were compared using an independent t-test adjusted for the effect of clustering. RESULTS: The AA-CPR group had a significantly better checklist score (p<0.001) and time to completion of 1 CPR cycle (p<0.001) than the DA-CPR group. In an objective assessment of psychomotor skill, the AA-CPR group demonstrated more accurate hand positioning (68.8+/-3.6%, p=0.033) and compression rate (72.4+/-3.7%, p=0.015) than DA-CPR group. However, the accuracy of compression depth (p=0.400), ventilation volume (p=0.977) and flow rate (p=0.627) were below 30% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Audiovisual animated CPR instruction through a cellular phone resulted in better scores in checklist assessment and time interval compliance in participants without CPR skill compared to those who received CPR instructions from a dispatcher; however, the accuracy of important psychomotor skill measures was unsatisfactory in both groups.
机译:简介:我们使用集成在手机中的动作捕捉动画开发了心肺复苏(CPR)指令程序。我们在没有进行过CPR培训的参与者中比较了动画辅助CPR指令和调度员辅助指令的效果。方法:本研究为单盲组随机试验。参与者被分配到动画辅助CPR(AA-CPR; 8组,44名参与者)组或调度员辅助CPR(DA-CPR; 8组,41名参与者)。 3名评估者将CPR周期的每个步骤的总体性能和时间记录在清单上。使用Resusci Anne SkillReporter人体模型评估客观表现。使用针对聚类效果进行调整的独立t检验比较两组之间的差异。结果:AA-CPR组的检查清单评分(p <0.001)和完成1个CPR周期的时间(p <0.001)明显优于DA-CPR组。在对心理运动技能的客观评估中,AA-CPR组显示出比DA-CPR组更准确的手部定位(68.8 +/- 3.6%,p = 0.033)和压迫率(72.4 +/- 3.7%,p = 0.015) 。但是,两组的压缩深度(p = 0.400),通气量(p = 0.977)和流速(p = 0.627)的准确性均低于30%。结论:与从调度员那里收到CPR指令的参与者相比,通过手机进行的视听动画CPR指令在没有CPR技能的参与者中在清单评估和时间间隔依从性方面得分更高;然而,两组重要的心理运动技能测量的准确性均不令人满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号