首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory care clinics of North America >What is the role of airway pressure release ventilation in the management of acute lung injury?
【24h】

What is the role of airway pressure release ventilation in the management of acute lung injury?

机译:呼吸道压力释放通气在急性肺损伤管理中的作用是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The lack of published evidence supporting the use of APRV in the pediatric critical care patient population may diminish its effective application in respiratory failure. The effect of APRV on the number of ventilator days, ICU stay, and mortality still remains to be studied. Further application of APRV in the role of rest settings for ECMO especially in the pediatric cardiac patient population needs to be investigated. Will the use of APRV decrease the time for adequate lung recruitment, decrease sheer trauma, and/or promote earlier decannulation upon the restoration of tolerable cardiac function? Can APRV be utilized as a re-recruitment maneuver? A comparison of APRV over sustained in a randomized-controlled fashion, will there be a significant difference in ventilator days, length of ICU stay, and/or mortality? Does re-recruitment at plateau pressures during suctioning, patient position changes, or in the face of increased airway resistance decrease the number of ventilator days, length of ICU stay,and/or mortality? Does the use of continuous monitoring of carbon dioxide production aid in optimizing P(high)? The list of questions, both speculative and scientific are too numerous to list. Speculation leads to inquiry which over time drives science. More focus is needed on randomized, controlled trials. Initially the comparison of APRV to HFOV needs to be the primary focus for a proactive approach for ALI. Once a comfort level is established with this modality, further scientific inquires will follow. In the meantime, its use is likely to remain controversial.
机译:缺乏支持在儿科重症监护患者群中使用APRV的公开证据可能会降低其在呼吸衰竭中的有效应用。 APRV对呼吸机天数,ICU停留时间和死亡率的影响仍有待研究。需要进一步研究APRV在ECMO休息设置中的作用,特别是在小儿心脏患者人群中的作用。 APRV的使用是否会减少恢复肺功能的时间,减少纯粹的外伤,和/或在可耐受的心脏功能恢复时促进较早的无血管扩张? APRV是否可以用作重新招募策略? APRV与以随机控制方式持续治疗的比较,呼吸机天数,ICU停留时间和/或死亡率是否有显着差异?在吸气,患者体位变化或面对增加的气道阻力时在稳定压力下重新招募是否会减少呼吸机天数,ICU停留时间和/或死亡率?使用二氧化碳生产的连续监测是否有助于优化P(高)?投机性和科学性的问题列表太多了,无法列出。投机导致了随着时间的流逝推动科学发展的询问。需要更多地关注随机对照试验。最初,将APRV与HFOV进行比较需要成为ALI主动方法的主要重点。一旦通过这种方式确定了舒适度,便会进行进一步的科学询问。同时,其使用可能仍会引起争议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号