...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Can the New Global Lung Initiative Equations Better Stratify the Risk of Death in Elderly People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?
【24h】

Can the New Global Lung Initiative Equations Better Stratify the Risk of Death in Elderly People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?

机译:新的“全球肺活动倡议”方程式能否更好地为患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病的老年人划分死亡风险?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) is commonly expressed as percentage of its value predicted by equations. The most commonly used equations are poorly applicable to elderly people. Recently, a set of equations (Global Lung Initiative, GLI) has been released that is expected to be more appropriate in this population. Objectives: We evaluated the agreement of the GLI, European Respiratory Society (ERS), and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) equations for prediction of FEV1 and compared their discriminative capacity with respect to mortality, taking as reference the prediction equation developed in the population from which our sample was drawn (SARA). Methods: We studied 264 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease aged >= 70 years. Agreement was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method, discriminative capacity using incidence rate ratios for mortality calculated across quartiles of each measure. Results: The mean age of the sample was 75.8 years (72.7% men). In women, the mean FEV1ERS/FEV1SARA, FEV1NHANES/FEV1SARA, and FEV1GLI/FEV1SARA were 0.81, 0.91, and 0.966, respectively. The corresponding values in men were 0.959, 0.963, and 1.02, respectively. The overall discriminative capacity with respect to death was equally poor for all equations. Conclusion: The GLI equations for predicting FEV1 provide similar estimates compared to an equation developed in a healthy subset of the population in which they are applied, and higher values compared to the ERS equation, especially in women. However, the use of the GLI equation does not improve the stratification of the risk of mortality in elderly people compared to ERS or NHANES equations. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:第一秒钟的强制呼气量(FEV1)通常表示为方程式预测的其强迫值的百分比。最常用的方程式不适用于老年人。最近,发布了一组方程(Global Lung Initiative,GLI),该方程组更适合此人群。目的:我们评估了GLI,欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)和国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)方程对FEV1预测的一致性,并比较了它们在死亡率方面的判别能力,并以此为参考建立了预测方程。从中抽取样本的人群(SARA)。方法:我们研究了264例年龄≥70岁的慢性阻塞性肺疾病。使用Bland-Altman方法评估一致性,使用每项四分位数的四分位数计算的死亡率的发生率比率来判别能力。结果:样本的平均年龄为75.8岁(男性为72.7%)。女性的平均FEV1ERS / FEV1SARA,FEV1NHANES / FEV1SARA和FEV1GLI / FEV1SARA分别为0.81、0.91和0.966。男性的相应值分别为0.959、0.963和1.02。对于所有方程式,关于死亡的总体判别能力同样很差。结论:与在应用FEV1的健康人群中开发的方程相比,用于预测FEV1的GLI方程提供了相似的估计值,并且与ERS方程相比具有更高的值,尤其是在女性中。但是,与ERS或NHANES方程相比,使用GLI方程并不能改善老年人的死亡风险分层。 (C)2016 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号